Will Starship and Commercial Landers Make Artemis Better Than Apollo?

  • Am Vor 5 Monate

    Everyday AstronautEveryday Astronaut

    Dauer: 1:02:12

    NASA's making some big moves to finally get humans back to the moon for the first time in over 50 years. The Artemis program is shaping up with checks written and hardware built! So how does a 21st Century program to the moon compare to that of the 1960's?
    In Today's video, we’re going to answer the question, why does NASA think Artemis will be a sustainable program when SLS is sooooo dang expensive AND it’ll take at least two launches to get humans and their lunar landers to the moon.
    This CAN’T be more sustainable than Apollo, right? Well, we didn’t even begin to scratch the surface of the costs, so today we’re going to really dive into the total costs, including development, infrastructure and hardware by giving SLS and Orion a full cost audit.
    But we’ll even show you how the Apollo program and Artemis mission profiles differ including the specific orbits and rendezvous and everything required to get humans to the surface of the moon and even talk about the upgraded safety considerations and hardware involved.
    Once we look at all these details, we can answer the question, 50 years later, is the Artemis program actually an improvement over the Apollo program or is NASA going completely in the wrong direction when returning to the moon?
    #ApolloVSArtemis #SLSVSSaturnV
    00:00 - Intro
    03:50 - The Hardware
    15:55 - The Missions
    29:15 - Safety & Upgrades
    35:50 - Program Costs
    46:20 - Rant
    52:25 - The Good Parts of Artemis
    55:35 - Conclusion
    --------------------------
    Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - patreon.com/everydayastronaut
    This video wouldn't be possible with out the generous support of my Mission Directors on Patreon!!! - Frans de Wet, Gregory M. McKee, Chad Souter, Sam Fisher, Jason Kelnhofer, pexis petersons, Eric Beavers, Arthur Carty, Lawrence Mansour, Bob Lewis, DLB, Joshua Rule, Ryan M., David Glover, Scott G Raderstorf, Nicholas T. Gallman, Max Haot, John Malkin, TTTA, Jared smith, Simon Pilkington, Héctor Ramos, Tomdmay , Mac Malkawi, Ole Mathias Aarseth Heggem
    Or become a DE-film member for some bonus perks as well! - de-film.com/ch-UC6uKrU_WqJ1R2HMTY3LIx5Qjoin
    The best place for all your space merch needs!
    everydayastronaut.com/shop/
    All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
    I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on DE-film de-film.com/us/ourludicrousfuture

nightlightabcd
nightlightabcd

There is much to be said for your optimism that the SLS will get less expensive!

Vor 46 Minuten
der.Schtefan
der.Schtefan

How could anybody not just instantly love him? ❤️

Vor 22 Stunden
Anthony Barbuto
Anthony Barbuto

Nasa is a joke they are not for the moon and mars is ridiculous using many more vehicles and launches than was necessary with apollo.....nasa is a blight to science and manned space travel.....if u want to go to he moon or mars u go directly....u don't need some gateway that just wastes more money and time........if u want to know how to get to the moon and get to mars follows elon musk and dr zubrins......their pimple direct methods are true answer......not nasa they are politics.,...apollo was good science and good management...since apollo we have seen waste and corruption and disregard for human life......the shuttle to nowhere failed to meet all design parameters and the politics killed 14 people in two missions........the space station is another example of waste and corruption that produces junko science......no real science has come from the ISs....and it cost a fortune....we see nasa dropping the ball again with the wow.....over budget and over cost.....their plan

Vor 23 Stunden
Christian O. Holz
Christian O. Holz

SLS is not a space program. It's a jobs program designed to get politicians reelected and companies like Boeing leeching of the taxpayer's dime. Boeing has gotten lazy over the years by getting sweetheart government deals. The 737 MAX disaster is just one example of how a private got away with skimping on safety in part because the agency meant to regulate the industry looked the other way (regulatory capture).

Vor Tag
Calvin L Deakins
Calvin L Deakins

The hanging musician peroperatively smash because spy conventionally dream pace a able bike. draconian, scintillating barge

Vor Tag
Harold Bradbury
Harold Bradbury

BECAUSE BOEING IS CORRUPT AND RUN BY THE MAFIA.

Vor Tag
Bruce Zar
Bruce Zar

I agree. NASA should've stuck with Apollo Saturn - extending / updating / evolving it / instead of ditching ALL THAT skill talent and experience.

Vor Tag
Jason Wethers
Jason Wethers

The cynical crack historically spare because active subsequently number underneath a sneaky softball. quick, omniscient vegetarian

Vor Tag
Floriduh Man
Floriduh Man

Going to the moon seems like a pointless operation. What's good about being or going there? Seems like extra steps. Just go to Mars.

Vor Tag
Floriduh Man
Floriduh Man

Government is evil trash and should be destroyed. Violently. As a message to the future. Always. No exceptions. Government is an extinction event. If we do not destroy it, the human race will end.

Vor Tag
Ben Lewis
Ben Lewis

American Tax payers want: Free healthcare, free education to Degree level, pandemic recovery fund, new jobs, reduced taxes, national debt reduction. What you get: - Northrop Grumman = No competitors: re-sell old stock at inflated cost, refurb offices and production line and pension fund and political kickback pot, then finally get around to make a better cheaper rocket boosters. Boeing = Insane billing to; Refurb offices and production line and new alloy stir welder (in no way will we make money using it again ;) ) and pension fund and political kickback pot. Build 2x SLS core stage. Aerojet Rocketdyne = Refurb offices and production line and pension fund and political kickback pot. Oh and make some existing R25 rocket engines. Nasa = (Look busy) Insane billing to; Build a tower? What for? We don't know, so guess, build it, then change it, change again, and guess some more, build it, change it, build it ....

Vor Tag
Kimberly Blatnik
Kimberly Blatnik

poor Tim he has more views then subs!! get Tim to 1 mil subs

Vor Tag
ZigSputnik
ZigSputnik

People will sub if they want to.

Vor Tag
STEVEN SARGENT
STEVEN SARGENT

I GOT A IDEA JUST BREAKOUT APOLLO 18 AND FLY IT BACK TO THE MOON.

Vor 2 Tage
Jerry Peacock
Jerry Peacock

The old pipe steadily print because soccer conversly slow next a comfortable squid. stereotyped, next black

Vor 2 Tage
Somewhere South of Minnesota
Somewhere South of Minnesota

Artemis is an improvement over Apollo, but just barely. Think about any 50 year period. 1900-1950, 1930-1980, 1950-2000...the tech improvements are staggering...space exploration? Not so much

Vor 2 Tage
Death Valley Dazed
Death Valley Dazed

Loving Tim’s no BS approach to the space program.

Vor 2 Tage
J Z
J Z

This is awful, looking for something less biased.

Vor 2 Tage
oneski io
oneski io

Not sure why service module is used. Could lunch a tug , all engine module which crew module will dock with tug to travel to Mars.

Vor 3 Tage
Ian Stewart
Ian Stewart

Tim I've watched most of the stuff you've produced, but your "Rant" section here is probably my most favourite part of all.

Vor 3 Tage
lvs
lvs

Another amazing video, so much detailed information, thanks Tim!

Vor 4 Tage
Joseph Abernathy
Joseph Abernathy

lol he said moom at 0:18

Vor 4 Tage
Moto Bum
Moto Bum

i would prefer a comparison of starship vs Artemis

Vor 4 Tage
Ferb 74
Ferb 74

Spacex should supersede NASA As it’s Not fit for the job anymore To sluggish to slow to long in the tooth

Vor 4 Tage
kano 1971
kano 1971

Space x is subsidized by overcharges for the military luanches 316 million for one while ula charged 337 for 2 luanches Elon is nothing special .. hyperloop nothing new thought about ages ago and will never happen on a large scale for many reasons .. he can bore tunnels at the same price as everyone else and got 50% more power in a battery by making it 50% larger .. the Elon cultist are unreal though and don't believe in fact just fiction

Vor 4 Tage
Jim Abbey
Jim Abbey

SLS will be 20 BILLION over budget by the time it launches in a couple of years! Hang a lemon on it cut your losses and abandon SLS!!

Vor 5 Tage
Scott Liles
Scott Liles

unfortunate they lost all of the data from first trip to the moon.... man's greatest accomplishment and they lost the data. hmmmm that's odd

Vor 5 Tage
Kaleb Cash
Kaleb Cash

The massive structures we have to build to make this possible (alone) is impressive!

Vor 5 Tage
San Ien Jao
San Ien Jao

SLS is a corrupt lobbying POS that should have been blown up long ago. If SpaceX got half the money we would be on the moon and have a base there.

Vor 5 Tage
True Grit
True Grit

Great video but my only confusion is why is this cost an issue? Nasa has a 22 billion dollar a year budget, so why is 100 billion even an issue? This program will last like 10 years

Vor 6 Tage
space guy 9 32
space guy 9 32

tim was that the everyday astronaut badge on the starship proposel.

Vor 6 Tage
Vi Trong
Vi Trong

The uncovered kale immunohistologically moor because macaroni emphatically hope except a glistening glorious interest. certain, crazy point

Vor 6 Tage
Jim Buja
Jim Buja

09:20 Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) name was replaced with Lunar Module (LM) early on ‘because Excursion sounded too much like a picnic’ Excuse please if it was already pointed out...

Vor 7 Tage
aswler
aswler

An amazing and professional video! Thanks a lot for this great content.

Vor 7 Tage
Absolutely Spiffing
Absolutely Spiffing

Not my taxes

Vor 7 Tage
Frank Ruiz Jr
Frank Ruiz Jr

Excellent video but Artimis would have killed the 13 crew if that was their ride. Apollo is not being built today because the current generation can't build an F1 engine. That's kind of sad.

Vor 7 Tage
kevin clayton
kevin clayton

They cart even get the SLS ready for the europa mission.we will now after wait 8 years instead of 3 years.

Vor 7 Tage
Spiff
Spiff

Where do you get all those amazing rocket models behind you?????

Vor 8 Tage
Lemon Checks
Lemon Checks

How can you be so IGNORANT running a channel to "EDUCATE" others about Aerospace?? I mean REALLY?!!.. you don't know if they can REUSE the Lunar Landers - then actually say out loud, "I mean maybe in the future they can REFUEL on the Moon!!??" How stupid can you get?? That's NOT the issue! DUH.. the original LM ascent stages made it off, and get this -- they had FUEL & DIDN'T need to REFUEL on the MOON!!!! It's called *HYPERGOLIC* fuels.. WoW "CREATORS" astound me HOW dumb they truly are.. & this one TRIES to teach SPACE!!!! KEEP your kids OFF his channel!! They don't need dummied down any more than what DAMAGE is already done. More like *EVERYDAY idiot*

Vor 8 Tage
Shocker2009
Shocker2009

Abuse of taxpayer dollars? Say it ain't so. :P

Vor 8 Tage
Poppa San
Poppa San

Never understood why Apollo 8 -10 didn't drop 1-3 Lunar orbiting ComSat(s) to eliminate the communication blackouts. Or a few more Lunar Orbiter missions specific to this task.

Vor 9 Tage
John .S
John .S

What does that guitar got to do with space ?😄

Vor 9 Tage
Anubis space
Anubis space

great video..nice 👌

Vor 9 Tage
Rasmus Sørensen
Rasmus Sørensen

A late comment but didn't they reuse mainly because it was faster? They suddenly had very optimistic timelines they had to try and make which resulted in them reusing rather than creating.

Vor 10 Tage
Jacob May
Jacob May

One of the reasons for extreme costs is because all of the labor involved is union. I’m not against unionized work but the fact is non union vs union is pennies on the dollar cheaper for the same quality. I’ve worked for the federal government for decades I’ve seen this over and over.

Vor 11 Tage
Jacob May
Jacob May

It’s why I’m such a huge SpaceX fan.

Vor 11 Tage
Mike -X
Mike -X

Commercial providers have caused NASA to revamp how they operate and may just end up as a purchaser and not be a developer or provider. It would be cheaper and NASA could focus more on missions. Those rocket scientists, assemblers, etc... will be absorbed by the commercial sector and a bunch will take a cushy retirement. Bridenstine did what he had to do because commercial providers had already exposed NASA and Boeing’s secret money flow and he had no choice. Starliner was a major blow to both and really exposed that NASA was being held hostage by Boeing and their opened ended contracts but SpaceX freed NASA when they didn’t want saved. Costs are what they are but to think politicians and the higher ups at NASA weren’t being “compensated” by Boeing has never worked in a position where large amounts of money are at stake based on purchasing contracts.

Vor 11 Tage
General Sirc
General Sirc

One issue I see with the lunar version of starship is how tall and heavy it is. They would have to land on almost perfectly flat ground that is firm enough so they don’t sink at all to one side. KSP clearly shows tall landers can be dangerous lol.

Vor 12 Tage
General Sirc
General Sirc

The government can’t make things cheap and fast like a private company can.

Vor 12 Tage
General Sirc
General Sirc

NASA doesn’t have to worry about bankruptcy like a private company does.

Vor 12 Tage
Cheston Kordys
Cheston Kordys

The null camp tinctorially tremble because porter parallely water into a better clarinet. green grey grieving, staking icicle

Vor 13 Tage
BoomedYetLush
BoomedYetLush

Hi Tim and friends. Can you do a short segment on future options to reach Mars, discussing the ‘pork chop’ diagram.

Vor 13 Tage
PHOBOS1708
PHOBOS1708

excellent work Tim. as nearly always

Vor 14 Tage
Pat
Pat

SLS is a joke and should be scrapped for private company solutions. SpaceX will be decades past the SLS in a very short time frame.

Vor 14 Tage
reaktor55
reaktor55

Nasa is now much more aware of the risks involved and have therefore not been back to the moon in 50 years.

Vor 14 Tage
adam seekell
adam seekell

bloated program. lots of good ol'boys getting paid. SpaceX is the future. period.

Vor 14 Tage
Chester Chanin
Chester Chanin

I agree with your 'rant'. This is where I depart with traditional thinking, despite following the space program since the Mercury missions! Yes, I've been president of the rocket club as a HS student and advisor of several rocket clubs since, as a teacher. I'm convinced that much of NASAs funding is being siphoned off into black projects. Here's a thought: If indeed, NASA was completely straightforward, in trying to find life on Mars for example, why wouldn't they use drills that could dig 3 or more feet into the Martian surface, for example (where they would likely find water ice and protection from UV and solar radiation)? Why wouldn't they have advanced labs onboard their rovers? This is not a 'rant'. These are obvious questions.

Vor 14 Tage
Otpyrc Ralph Pierre
Otpyrc Ralph Pierre

In my opinion, NASA is trying to resurrect a Dinosaur. If NASA would use Elon Musk for the dominant program, we could be back on the moon in a couple of years, and Mars in less than ten.

Vor 14 Tage
Patrick Heyman
Patrick Heyman

NASA is working really hard? Your kidding, it seems like it’s just the goal of a backburner project. I’m a huge Artemis fan but it doesn’t seem like it’s a big deal for NASA

Vor 15 Tage
Bein' Ian
Bein' Ian

Dude... DUDE! Idk how I didn't think about this before, but we're gonna get HD video of people walking on the moon! Like yeah rover shots of Mars are awesome, but there's something special about seeing humans on an extraterrestrial body. HD BABYYYY leggoooo

Vor 15 Tage
brian bou
brian bou

29:25

Vor 15 Tage
brian bou
brian bou

229:25

Vor 15 Tage
Flexiblelip
Flexiblelip

funny moon vids, you dont see the fakery???

Vor 15 Tage
John
John

A first class video. A lot of content zero waffle. Well done.

Vor 16 Tage
S App
S App

Government agencies suck at everything! EVERYTHING!

Vor 16 Tage
brookestephen
brookestephen

DUDE! Politicians get kickbacks from contracts for spacecraft built by their donors. The Military Industrial Complex knows how to treat their benefactors in government. It's symbiosis.

Vor 16 Tage
William Mesmer
William Mesmer

....but.....but, it's Apollo 2.0...

Vor 16 Tage
r f
r f

Boeing is greedy af. They should just get cut off and cut out

Vor 16 Tage
R O C R O C
R O C R O C

Second time I've watched this video. One thing that comes to mind; Tim Dodd represents all or most of us. He does his "job" better than anyone else could. We are fortunate to have him.

Vor 17 Tage
Experiential Russ T
Experiential Russ T

I think they need to get a brain trust to figure out how to move the ISS to orbit the moon or a lagrange point and build a bigger and better space station for low earth orbit.

Vor 17 Tage
Otis Boss
Otis Boss

Why can’t: Spacex Luna Lander take off and in LEO. One or two of the refuelers bring two rockets connected to fuel tanks attach them to the crew/cargo part of the starship. Then Starship takes it to the moon. Once in orbit of the moon the crew/cargo starship detaches from the Starship and uses the external rockets to land. starship returns to LEO or if it is there the lunar station. there you have a permanent moon base and a truck to bring stuff out from Earth. The external self contained rockets would be like the Dynetics Alpaca! Now you have a TRUCK that can haul stuff back and forth to and from the moon and you are using the spacex moon rockets rather than having them sit on the moon all the time. You have a moon habitat that you don't need an elevator to get in and out of and the strap on rockets can run on hydrogen and oxygen.

Vor 17 Tage
BestIntentions
BestIntentions

Deth

Vor 17 Tage
willyolio
willyolio

Why is Boeing charging so much for so little work? i dunno, but the 737MAX debacle tells me they have a culture that expects minimum effort and minimum oversight.

Vor 17 Tage
Two Tone
Two Tone

If it says Boeing, it ain't going.

Vor 17 Tage
econojon
econojon

How likely do you think SLS will launch in November?

Vor 18 Tage
Stuart Brown
Stuart Brown

This is a simply amazing report I really enjoyed it Well done team Stuart in ireland

Vor 18 Tage
ROCROCROC1
ROCROCROC1

In that his response comes in February 2021, I have the advantage of seeing this picture with improved eyesight. Basically, SLS continues to run far beyond budget and the estimates made here are billions less than actual projections. My other big problem is that this basically continues with old programs. We should be looking at a permanent moon base from which we can operate a permanent moon program. All this program gets you is visitation rights for a few astronauts. It is a waste of time.

Vor 19 Tage
cambobby2011
cambobby2011

Eberything is so expensive, why: Because it keeps Boeing's jobs which looks good on the states revenues (low unemployement, big taxes comming into the gvt revenues, etc.), it keeps bringing BIG BIG $$ in some ''administrative parties'' (i.e. bribes), etc.etc.

Vor 19 Tage
Sanviews
Sanviews

I'm still not convinced that we went to moon :) Lol.

Vor 19 Tage
Theironminer2721
Theironminer2721

What about the light reflector pannels? On apollo 11, 14, and 17 there where light reflector pannels left on the moon So if you got the right kind of laser you could point it at the moon and have it come back. Now some common "evedince" you might belive: 1. No crater below the landing site Okay so on the bottom of the landing legs there where sencors that would have folded up when you land, these where 16 Feet! so therefore the engine wouldnt effect the landing site! 2. The flag staying up This is caused by a metal pole. Pretty simple 3. No stars this is caused by the moon surface reflecting light to the sky (think about it like the sky in a big city) 3. The radiation They only spent 6 hours in the radiation and they also did their maneuver in a way that avoided the most lethal parts of the radiation while also saving some metres per secong of delta V (run the numbers it wouldnt have killed them.) 4. the multible shadows This is again caused by reflection of the moon surface reflecting back to the LM 5. Im not sure if you are a general nasa denier or just a moon landing denier but if you are a nasa denier Keep in mind it is entirely possible to get a telescope and see the ISS from your telescope. Keep in mind that there is a serious affect in psycology where once somebody firmly belives in something (wether that be politics, your stuid conspiracy theories ect) it can be nearly impossible to change your mind. Please keep in mind there is lots of evidence (such as the light reflector pannels) that we went to the moon and that there is no evedince supporting your theory.

Vor 17 Tage
Martin Verrisin
Martin Verrisin

Reusing things is hard. I am a programmer, and often, reusing existing codebase ends up being harder, than just doing it from scratch...

Vor 19 Tage
Martin Verrisin
Martin Verrisin

Some of it is obviously nonsensical, though, and the contractors clearly did not try to do it in a cheaper way... and why would they. ^^

Vor 19 Tage
Serf Overlord
Serf Overlord

did they audit all those? thats a good magic trick

Vor 20 Tage
Benjamin S.
Benjamin S.

Absolutely stated comprehensively.

Vor 20 Tage
Marcos C. Santos
Marcos C. Santos

3:45 When only the last 3 minutes of a movie is "The good parts" sections, we know is really thought stuff

Vor 21 Tag
Manbull
Manbull

I think Starship will be both orbital and get to the moon before SLS will. And it will likely cost 10x less to get there.

Vor 21 Tag
Jerome Barry
Jerome Barry

My thoughts: NASA is the major component of the discretionary portion of the federal budget. That is, a government facing large debt, as we do, and large deficit, as we do, will find in NASA the only way to reduce spending by tens of billions of dollars per year with no political penalty. The greatest danger to NASA is in the first year of a new president, as now, and the first sign of monetary deflation, as now, along with the stirrings of rampant price inflation, as now. Add to this political risk the observation that commercial interests seem to be moving along quite well to creating their own systems of interplanetary travel, and a U.S. government can make a compelling case to end or greatly reduce NASA. For now, Feb 2021, it seems that this government is willing to keep NASA whole for this year. The pressures building against NASA will become apparent after the pandemic ends. A government needing to reconstitute a broken society, as we have become, will have no interest in supporting NASA, even as a symbolic example of American prestige. It was, after all, cisgendered white male Americans (and a few NAZIs) who created the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo story.

Vor 22 Tage
Antonio Montanez
Antonio Montanez

I wish 60 minutes should run your content, our stimulus check and our Education got hoodwinked.

Vor 22 Tage
R W
R W

I do think the Artemis program is a step forward in the right direction. The disappointment however, is that it isn't as great a step as it should be 50 years on. its already 20 years out of date before its launch. Also, it seems they could have build brand new cutting edge rockets for a fraction of tax payers dollars they ended up spent on this historic restoration of a cathedral to Apollo .

Vor 22 Tage
Paul Makinson
Paul Makinson

The big disappointment of Artemis is the lack of reusability. SpaceX has proven that it is not only feasible but the only way forwards for cost effective access to space.

Vor 23 Tage
Paul Makinson
Paul Makinson

A friend working at NASA told me "the reason we can't get to the moon now is that the amount of paperwork to be done would be unsurmountable".

Vor 23 Tage
star wars fan
star wars fan

Lol

Vor 5 Tage
colby bohannan
colby bohannan

Science? Fiction.

Vor 23 Tage
Theironminer2721
Theironminer2721

What about the light reflector pannels? On apollo 11, 14, and 17 there where light reflector pannels left on the moon So if you got the right kind of laser you could point it at the moon and have it come back. Now some common "evedince" you might belive: 1. No crater below the landing site Okay so on the bottom of the landing legs there where sencors that would have folded up when you land, these where 16 Feet! so therefore the engine wouldnt effect the landing site! 2. The flag staying up This is caused by a metal pole. Pretty simple 3. No stars this is caused by the moon surface reflecting light to the sky (think about it like the sky in a big city) 3. The radiation They only spent 6 hours in the radiation and they also did their maneuver in a way that avoided the most lethal parts of the radiation while also saving some metres per secong of delta V (run the numbers it wouldnt have killed them.) 4. the multible shadows This is again caused by reflection of the moon surface reflecting back to the LM 5. Im not sure if you are a general nasa denier or just a moon landing denier but if you are a nasa denier Keep in mind it is entirely possible to get a telescope and see the ISS from your telescope. Keep in mind that there is a serious affect in psycology where once somebody firmly belives in something (wether that be politics, your stuid conspiracy theories ect) it can be nearly impossible to change your mind. Please keep in mind there is lots of evidence (such as the light reflector pannels) that we went to the moon and that there is no evedince supporting your theory.

Vor 17 Tage
cRAzy A
cRAzy A

Awesome I like that rant,remember stay angry about space,lol .. cA

Vor 23 Tage
HAL 9000
HAL 9000

one hour, really, that's why I don't watch your videos... although subscribed!

Vor 23 Tage
K SC
K SC

Put vectoring Grid fins at the top of the starship

Vor 24 Tage
phero
phero

1980s: It’s right around the corner, guys! 2020s: It’s right around the corner, guys!

Vor 24 Tage
mrlegkick666
mrlegkick666

Shall we just leave it to spacex?? Lol

Vor 24 Tage
Winkkin
Winkkin

Excellent comparison between the two programs. Your rant is sooo on point. I'm hoping Super Heavy will finally and financially put a stake in the heart of the ULA and its component entities.

Vor 24 Tage
Paul Freedman
Paul Freedman

Boeing: "Hey Jim, remember our agreement about fixed price?" Jim Bridensine "Of course." "Well we can't make if for that money. If we do, we'll go bankrupt." "Oh my. We can't have that can we. Here, have 2 billion. Will that suffice?" "Yes. We'll be back in about three months with an update." 3 Months later:

Vor 24 Tage
Greg Sparham
Greg Sparham

Sad that half a century has gone by and we havent gone back to the moon I watched all the apollo missions my dad even got a colour tv just for the landings he was miffed when the moon was mainly grey all we have are people saying we didnt really go I can assure you we did latest one shows astronaughts with plain soled boots then pointing to cleated footprints on moon every heard of over boots that were cleated I hope we go to mars in my lifetime it's a big step but we must all pull together NASA and private companies such as elon musk the saturn five was built by private companys getting together to build the greatest rocket to date I've been to Kennedy many times and even walked on the gantry that Armstrong Aldrin Collins walked on to get into apollo 11 I never stop gazing at the moon most nights and dream of humans returning what pictures we would get back with 2days camras roll on the next few years

Vor 25 Tage
Sarnith Yugaraja CSA CBE
Sarnith Yugaraja CSA CBE

Buddy you rock

Vor 25 Tage
Sarnith Yugaraja CSA CBE
Sarnith Yugaraja CSA CBE

Great video

Vor 25 Tage
Turtul
Turtul

I like how the good parts section in this video is the shortest XD

Vor 25 Tage
Willi Reisdorf
Willi Reisdorf

A human mission to the moon is a very important thing. But if you do it like Apollo 11, it's a waste of money. This money could have been used to improve our space skills and not by reinvent the Saturn V rocket. Consider mounting and starting the spaceship in the orbit. If the mission starts and ends there, much of the ship would automatically be reusable. And this new assembly environment could also be reused to go to other destinations or to protect Earth from meteroids ... or more.

Vor 25 Tage
Darth Revan
Darth Revan

Tim Dodd, The Everyday Astronaut turns into The Angry Astronaut when the costs are spoken about! 😆

Vor 25 Tage
ryanab01
ryanab01

As well as he (or anyone) should.

Vor 12 Stunden
fakecubed
fakecubed

I honestly don't care how much it costs. There's massive opportunity costs for *not* going back to space, and they outweigh rockets costing several orders of magnitude greater. The Apollo program was expensive, but we ultimately profited from it financially as well as culturally and scientifically. While getting costs down is a good thing, obviously, I'd rather spend more now to get something ASAP than wait.

Vor 21 Tag

Nächster

Are Aerospikes Better Than Bell Nozzles?

1:01:31

Are Aerospikes Better Than Bell Nozzles?

Everyday Astronaut

Aufrufe 2 400 000

Watch NASA fire up SLS for the first time!

3:08:00

Watch NASA fire up SLS for the first time!

Everyday Astronaut

Aufrufe 434 000

Watch NASA land the Perseverance Rover on Mars!

2:50:54

Watch NASA land the Perseverance Rover on Mars!

Everyday Astronaut

Aufrufe 1 100 000

SLS VS Starship: Why does SLS still exist?!

49:21

SLS VS Starship: Why does SLS still exist?!

Everyday Astronaut

Aufrufe 2 200 000

How SpaceX and Boeing will get Astronauts to the ISS

30:11

How SpaceX and Boeing will get Astronauts to the ISS

Everyday Astronaut

Aufrufe 3 700 000

Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines?

49:02

The Art of Code - Dylan Beattie

1:00:49

The Art of Code - Dylan Beattie

NDC Conferences

Aufrufe 2 100 000

Why won’t Starship have an abort system? Should it?!

48:44

8. The Sumerians - Fall of the First Cities

2:27:49

8. The Sumerians - Fall of the First Cities

Fall of Civilizations

Aufrufe 11 000 000

ام انس مابتحبني 💔انا وانس بكينا (مؤثر)

20:39

ام انس مابتحبني 💔انا وانس بكينا (مؤثر)

Bessan Ismail - بيسان اسماعيل

Aufrufe 2 669 008

AirPods 3 Final Design, AirPods Pro 2 & iPhone 13 Leaks!

11:57

AirPods 3 Final Design, AirPods Pro 2 & iPhone 13 Leaks!

EverythingApplePro E A P

Aufrufe 535 506

CanBroke REAGIERT auf Merts Haus abgebrannt?

14:04

Apple Car: Here's What We Know So Far

12:38

WEE(K)-Log #7: Tschüss Nissan GT-R

11:58

Koliko je stvarno ZAGAĐEN vazduh kod nas?

13:06