The Longest-Running Evolution Experiment

  • Am Vor Monat

    VeritasiumVeritasium

    If you ran evolution all over again, would you get humans? How repeatable is ? This video is sponsored by @BountyBrand.

    Special thanks to Prof. Richard Lenski and team for showing me around the lab - it is an honor to be able to witness and document such a historic science experiment.
    Thanks to Dr Zachary Blount for the help with research and setting up the competition time-lapse, Dr Nkrumah Grant for microscope images of the long-term line cells @NkrumahGrant
    Devin Lake, Kate Bellgowan, and Dr. Minako Izutsu for being part of this video. Long Live the LTEE!

    LTEE website - myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/index.html
    Intro footage courtesy of the Kishony Lab - kishony.technion.ac.il
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    References:
    Lenski, R. E., & Travisano, M. (1994). Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(15), 6808-6814. - ve42.co/Lenski1994

    Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C., & Tadler, S. C. (1991). Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. The American Naturalist, 138(6), 1315-1341. - ve42.co/Lenski1991

    Good, B. H., McDonald, M. J., Barrick, J. E., Lenski, R. E., & Desai, M. M. (2017). The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations. Nature, 551(7678), 45-50. - ve42.co/Good2017

    Blount, Z. D., Borland, C. Z., & Lenski, R. E. (2008). Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(23), 7899-7906. - ve42.co/Blount2008

    Blount, Z. D., Lenski, R. E., & Losos, J. B. (2018). Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life’s tape. Science, 362(6415). - ve42.co/Blount2018

    Wiser, M. J., Ribeck, N., & Lenski, R. E. (2013). Long-term dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Science, 342(6164), 1364-1367. - ve42.co/Wiser2013

    N, Scharping. (2019). How a 30-Year Experiment Has Fundamentally Changed Our View of How Evolution Works. Discover - ve42.co/Scharping

    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Special thanks to Patreon supporters: Mike Tung, Evgeny Skvortsov, Meekay, Ismail Öncü Usta, Paul Peijzel, Crated Comments, Anna, Mac Malkawi, Michael Schneider, Oleksii Leonov, Jim Osmun, Tyson McDowell, Ludovic Robillard, Jim buckmaster, fanime96, Juan Benet, Ruslan Khroma, Robert Blum, Richard Sundvall, Lee Redden, Vincent, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Alfred Wallace, Arjun Chakroborty, Joar Wandborg, Clayton Greenwell, Pindex, Michael Krugman, Cy 'kkm' K'Nelson, Sam Lutfi, Ron Neal

    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Research and Writing by by Derek Muller, Petr Lebedev and Casey Rentz
    Animation by Iván Tello
    Filmed by Derek Muller, Emily Zhang and Raquel Nuno
    Edited by Derek Muller
    Music by Jonny Hyman and from Epidemic Sound epidemicsound.com
    Additional video supplied by Getty Images
    Thumbnail image courtesy of the Kishony Lab
    Produced by Casey Rentz
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Scott Kidder
Scott Kidder

Wait, but evolution wouldn’t really happen if you didn’t have the selective pressure of competing with other bacteria for resources. I mean it would, the bacteria would still have mutations, but as long as the those mutations weren’t fatal, the colonies would simply randomly generate new versions but none of them would be selected for. In other words, there wouldn’t really be any “improvement” because there wouldn’t be any need to. What would they be improving at? I guess what I’m saying is that your environment is changing and it’s hard to imagine one in which nothing changed. Even in lab conditions, there’s still selective pressure. And as the colony grows, that pressure increases. So evolution is happening in the colonies not in spite of there being no environmental change in the lab, but because of it. Or are you saying that the environmental change is relatively small in the lab compared to the “wild.” And therefore, we’d expect to see a higher rate of evolutionary adaption in the wild than we would expect in the lab? Or were you saying that even in a static environment, there’s always a way to become better adapted to it, there is no perfect way to be adapted? It seems to me, nature would find the top best ways to be adapted and they would probably be different. But I also ask the question, is it even possible to keep the environment static and unchanging? And environment with 10 million bacteria in the same media is very different than an environment with 10. Even an environment with 11 bacteria is different than one with 10. So how could you effectively keep the environment the same? Or am I just missing the point? Lol

Vor 2 Stunden
Elu Herrahaz
Elu Herrahaz

But why does it stay coli and doesn't evolve into a new species of bacteria?

Vor 2 Stunden
PoM MoM
PoM MoM

Horrifying

Vor 3 Stunden
Poindexter Queue
Poindexter Queue

Deliberately creating superbacteria... what could go wrong?

Vor 10 Stunden
martixy
martixy

SCIENCE!

Vor 12 Stunden
RB 70
RB 70

At what point in the experiment did the E. Coli change into a different species of microorganism?

Vor 18 Stunden
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

The E coli don't change into a different species. The population diverges and accumulates differences, and at some point people determine these differences sufficient to label the populations as separate species. Species is a human concept, and a human label. By an ecotype conception of microbial species, the Ara-3 strain should already be classified as a separate species. By a more conventional delimitation, not until the populations reach a 3% 16S divergence.

Vor 5 Stunden
Sahnoune Khaled
Sahnoune Khaled

its adaptation not evolution

Vor 21 Stunde
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over successive generations, which this definitely is.

Vor 5 Stunden
David Lee
David Lee

Ah a miniverse

Vor Tag
Jean d'Arc
Jean d'Arc

So let me get this straight... you guys are evolving super hungry, super fast breeding bacteria that aren't fussy eaters :/

Vor Tag
ranty13
ranty13

But after the equivalent of "1.5 million years" of evolution, they haven't really evolved. They are still E.coli, just better adapted E.coli. They still have the DNA of E.coli. They haven't evolved into worms or another organism. I would say this is evidence of adaptation, not evolution.

Vor Tag
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"I would say this is evidence of adaptation, not evolution." Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over successive generations, which this definitely is. "They haven't evolved into worms or another organism." If they evolved into worms or another organism, that would disprove evolution. Expecting as evidence for evolution something that would disprove evolution is a fairly clear demonstration that you don't understand what evolution is in the first place.

Vor 5 Stunden
Climb High
Climb High

And everyone wonder how we get to the Fauci Ouchie and the bio-terrorism we going through now. Starts like this right here

Vor Tag
Paul Doughty
Paul Doughty

This is cool to watch however a non-scientist here would think that these bacteria are adapting not evolving. Meaning these bacteria didn’t grow a tail or change their physical attributes to become something else. The closest they came was that they introduced something new to their diet. A far cry from physical change. My kid decided to try mushrooms last week but he’s still my son. Definitely cool but not what I think defines evolution.

Vor 2 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"would think that these bacteria are adapting not evolving" Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over successive generations, which this definitely is.

Vor Tag
Robert Cummins
Robert Cummins

Bounty? Really? Bizarre.

Vor 2 Tage
Taliesin River
Taliesin River

Promoting paper towels is pretty dumb. You're trying to make people afraid of doing something that was never dangerous with a very unscientific experiment, and promoting an unnecessary product that's bad for the environment. I'm disappointed that a science channel I respect would accept a sponsor like this.

Vor 2 Tage
Rin倫
Rin倫

So, is this theory can apply to viruses too? If so, people can estimate how frequently Covid-19 will change per generation in theory?

Vor 2 Tage
Kyle Mecca
Kyle Mecca

This is absolutely amazing, I am fascinated by evolution. I want to see more Also I'm surprised you advertised bounty. There is nothing wrong with a little bacteria and germaphobia is indicative of a disconnection with the earth. Let's reduce and reuse, not encourage waste due to neurotic fears.

Vor 2 Tage
Taliesin River
Taliesin River

yes, very disappointing. Especially his completely unscientific 'experiment' to prove why they're useful.

Vor 2 Tage
Marge N.
Marge N.

So this is what will actually kill us all?

Vor 2 Tage
relentlessmadman
relentlessmadman

I also use paper towels but I use the less expensive brands

Vor 3 Tage
relentlessmadman
relentlessmadman

does any one make paper towels from hemp yet????

Vor 3 Tage
Danny Ramirez
Danny Ramirez

My question is would there ever be a singularity that would happen during the evolutionary process

Vor 3 Tage
mark green
mark green

What a brilliant universe G-D Created, even a tiny bacterium is programed to evolve, WOW!!!

Vor 3 Tage
Rhianne Moll
Rhianne Moll

Eat E. coli, Jonathan Wells!

Vor 3 Tage
Арсенал
Арсенал

11:15 I got goosebumps here.

Vor 3 Tage
Rhadoo RootBwoy
Rhadoo RootBwoy

Sponsored by paper towels... How about you stop promoting non eco-friendly products?

Vor 3 Tage
Thom Of Hillbilly Haven
Thom Of Hillbilly Haven

gloves??

Vor 3 Tage
Heinz Dontbother
Heinz Dontbother

@Veritasium, you might suggest the professor and his students to use mipar (mipar.us) to count those bacteria. Counting by hand is not necessary nowadays.

Vor 3 Tage
BP
BP

Could you try this with various antibiotics? seperated from each other in the same fashion ? Did you try bacteria from the Ganges river? I heated that there is a antibiotics plant dumping these batches of bacteria in the water…

Vor 3 Tage
Tom shiba
Tom shiba

would be funny if one day thes ebacteria became small animals with eyes

Vor 4 Tage
Terry Caldwell
Terry Caldwell

The smartest ad integration

Vor 4 Tage
chuck sch.
chuck sch.

Wow, this is real nice science, love it! Keep going with you works its really cool. :D

Vor 4 Tage
Matthew Salvatar
Matthew Salvatar

Wait, so if I get the ending there. Life shows a capacity to transcend entropy?

Vor 4 Tage
To Serve Man
To Serve Man

Define "Entropy." And nothing in the universe (flowing chain reactions) transcends the universe.

Vor 3 Tage
Danish
Danish

When did Adam Ragusea start doin science content ?

Vor 4 Tage
michaelsimkin
michaelsimkin

According to the evolution theory they were supposed to develop into a multicellular organism or something. And this is what we do not see.

Vor 4 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"According to the evolution theory they were supposed to develop into a multicellular organism or something." So you're saying you don't know anything about evolutionary theory? Fun.

Vor 4 Tage
erikfinnegan
erikfinnegan

Veritasium FAKE for money: big experiment setup to pitch paper towels — microprint disclamer in the end says that experiment is "not representative". Not the the sort of statistical significance that I've grown used to wrt this channel. Oh, and you should always use recycled material or wash. There's always room for a couple kitchen cloths in the washer.

Vor 5 Tage
David Kellen
David Kellen

I'm really concerned about how they handle bacteria... No gloves, just a slight "Touch" in the fire and "importante" the material and bacteria are being exposed to Open air...

Vor 5 Tage
Tyray3P
Tyray3P

It's all well and good until the germs can transfer through xenonite

Vor 5 Tage
Cedric Velarde
Cedric Velarde

1st gen e coli: we cant eat that its deadly! 1000000+ gen e coli: u wut m8?!

Vor 5 Tage
A Real Life Dog
A Real Life Dog

Crematoriums are for organisms that are already dead... Those furnaces look more like something found at Dachau

Vor 5 Tage
МАТЬ-РОССИЯ
МАТЬ-РОССИЯ

*how to create a supervirus*

Vor 5 Tage
gyamlj
gyamlj

This is a highly controlled environment. Compare the competitive advantage of the newest and oldest colonies in a natural world where innumerable other factors weigh in to survival. It may very well be that the older organisms are better able to survive. This is analogous to selective breeding that creates an animal with desired characteristics but is otherwise less capable of overall survival compared to its ancestors. I'm afraid this teaches me nothing.

Vor 5 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"I'm afraid this teaches me nothing." Says more about you than the experiment, I think.

Vor 4 Tage
Ashethorama
Ashethorama

Did anyone else notice the reference from the movie “The 13th Warrior” on the fridge? Timestamp 7:50 minute

Vor 6 Tage
Seven Ligthson
Seven Ligthson

YES! Nothing out is not in and everything out is in ;-)) 1.5 (oo.000) is human program given by life = love = what you are in need of, who (do you) are (you)? I took my ABO once more!

Vor 6 Tage
Christopher Inman
Christopher Inman

Queen Elizabeth I (of England) cooked a fruitcake for members of parliament to celebrate its opening. A bit was saved to be included in the next parliament's opening, etc. So now, when parliament begins its new season, the members are privileged to have a bit of cake cooked by Shakespeare's favorite monarch! [i have not fact-checked this because i don't want to find out if it is not true]

Vor 6 Tage
maruftim
maruftim

Mad scientist fell into bacteria gacha hell...

Vor 6 Tage
AJ T
AJ T

Is he referring to Confirmation Bias or is it something else?

Vor 6 Tage
ZedCactus
ZedCactus

This episode was great! Really interesting.

Vor 6 Tage
Lief Bamberg
Lief Bamberg

disappoinited that derek is now hawking that idea that greater bacterial spread is somehow dirtier, and that you should use disposible environment wrecking paper over washable cloths.

Vor 6 Tage
WowZers
WowZers

Imagine being the chad bacteria to first eat the citrate

Vor 7 Tage
Rodrigo Segura
Rodrigo Segura

42, ¿coincidence? I think not

Vor 7 Tage
Frenchnostalgique
Frenchnostalgique

Prof Richard Lenski has the same accent as Rich Evans and it's throwing me off.

Vor 7 Tage
Azurium
Azurium

Me seeing 1% selection first hand: "So that's what the aliens are doing to our universe and what the Great Filter could be."

Vor 7 Tage
Azurium
Azurium

Context: imagine that at 7:30 he's talking about intergalactic species expanding across the universe.

Vor 7 Tage
Christian412 America
Christian412 America

The educated dumbasses still call it evolution. After 70000+ generations the bacteria is still producing bacteria. The bacteria has not produced anything but bacteria. Why is it so hard to get un biased conclusions? The only thing that has been observed is ADAPTATION not evolution.

Vor 7 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"The educated dumbasses still call it evolution" Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over successive generations, which this definitely is. "The bacteria has not produced anything but bacteria" If they produced something other than bacteria, it would disprove evolution. You understand that, right?

Vor 7 Tage
SuperSonic Boom
SuperSonic Boom

Nah, if the flask breaks we become the solution to the experiment.

Vor 7 Tage
Michael Kurek
Michael Kurek

It’s called mutation or adaptation. NOT EVOLUTION! The bacteria will always remain bacteria, just more resistant.

Vor 7 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over successive generations, which this definitely is.

Vor 7 Tage
Guy Fox
Guy Fox

IT'S GOD! LOL

Vor 8 Tage
Samaila Abdullahi
Samaila Abdullahi

I am forever grateful to Dr IGUDIA on YouTube who cured me from herpes with his herbal medication, you are so real and trusted.

Vor 8 Tage
RD2564
RD2564

Beautiful video. Biosciences are a rich hunting ground for new videos.

Vor 8 Tage
David Blank
David Blank

So...when do they turn into monkeys??? Can monkeys evolve into bacteria???

Vor 8 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"So...when do they turn into monkeys" Based on evolutionary science, never. If you think evolution suggests otherwise, you don't understand evolution.

Vor 8 Tage
DeadEndFrog
DeadEndFrog

well don't judge the Qu when they do this to us :^)

Vor 8 Tage
lalit pal
lalit pal

I see you evolving from young youtuber :D

Vor 9 Tage
wildstar2424242424
wildstar2424242424

A million bacterial monkeys typing on a million bacterial type-writers.... One of them finally wrote the opening to hamlet

Vor 9 Tage
Mike Tacos
Mike Tacos

13:48 A couple more generations and they’ll be growing eyes and noses.

Vor 9 Tage
Mike Tacos
Mike Tacos

Then someone breaks the glass.

Vor 9 Tage
Chris Koll
Chris Koll

I'll bet you I can make a dog "evolve" so that it will CRAVE something that canines would NEVER consume if left to their own tastes(sp?)...

Vor 9 Tage
mwuaha
mwuaha

what?

Vor 9 Tage
Truther
Truther

Are tests like this being done on viruses?

Vor 9 Tage
FuriousGeezer
FuriousGeezer

So what you are saying is, after 75,000 generations, it's just better bacteria, but in the same amount of generations we went from monkey to man? Why didn't it macro evolve?

Vor 10 Tage
FuriousGeezer
FuriousGeezer

@Crispr CAS9 fair enough! I am still seeing no evidence of macro evolution, but that timeline sure makes it look like more of a possibility. My timeline was clearly off

Vor 9 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@FuriousGeezer "it's a long time from bacteria to monkey" Monkeys are not descended from bacteria. "We get what a billion or so years?" 3.5 billion from first life to complex life, another 100 million to get on land, another 150 million for mammals, another 100 million for primates, another 50 for humans. Approximately.

Vor 9 Tage
FuriousGeezer
FuriousGeezer

@Crispr CAS9 Both are human though, yes. I poorly worded it.

Vor 9 Tage
FuriousGeezer
FuriousGeezer

@Crispr CAS9 it's a long time from bacteria to monkey and again to man. Not sure there is time for that🤷🏼‍♂️. We get what a billion or so years?

Vor 9 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

In the same number of generations, our ancestors went from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens. Both of those are humans.

Vor 9 Tage
Neiley
Neiley

so how long til one of the containers crawls off? :P

Vor 10 Tage
sf
sf

using the same needle for different flask samples???!!

Vor 10 Tage
Bangs Cutter
Bangs Cutter

The human scale equivalent of this would be alien abduction encounters, where aliens continuously sample humans as they observe our evolution.

Vor 10 Tage
Brad Shymon
Brad Shymon

Shouldn't forget all the generations of students who evolved the professor's knowledge and status! 🧐

Vor 10 Tage
realitycheck2001
realitycheck2001

Wait. She wasn’t wearing gloves. Am I missing something?

Vor 10 Tage
Gary CLark
Gary CLark

Ok thats stretch of a comparison. The mutations of a one cell bacterium are quite different than the mutations that would have to occur for an ape like creature to transform into what man is today. I don't care how many million years you tack on to it.

Vor 10 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Gary CLark "viable offspring means to me that the offspring can then reproduce." Then you are looking for the word 'fertile'. Viable just means 'living', so the offspring is born and can survive. "The sturddlefish is sterile like the mule" That's unclear at this point. They won't hit sexual maturity for a decade, so until then it's just guess work. Also, mules are not always sterile, just usually, and the overwhelming majority of hybrids are more fertile than mules. "Do we have empirical evidence of this?" Yes, it's how reproduction works. "Is there any physical evidence to show these ancestral lineages?" The fossil record. "but I still have issue with the assumption that an organism of one species is the inherent ancestor of another species." Good news, we don't assume any single organism is an ancestor to another species. The theory operates at the level of populations, not individuals. 'Ancestral to' usually just means that a fossil population is more closely related to the actual ancestors of a modern population than to anything else, not that it literally contained the ancestors. "We don't have evidence of one species evolving into another species in the fossil record or in todays timeline" Very technically, a population becomes a different species from its ancestors when people say it does, because species is a human label. What we have extensive evidence for is populations diverging morphologically over time, and such morphological divergence is highly correlated with getting labeled as a separate species by people. But using a more colloquial understanding of 'one species evolving into another', we have plenty of examples. Homo erectus to Homo sapiens, for one. We also have really great records for the evolution of horses, whales, birds and several other groups of dinosaurs, a huge number of fish lineages, and countless invertebrates. More or less every major transition is covered. "or in todays timeline." There are dozens of laboratory examples of speciation, and several examples in the wild.

Vor 2 Tage
Gary CLark
Gary CLark

@Crispr CAS9 viable offspring means to me that the offspring can then reproduce. The sturddlefish is sterile like the mule. A hybrid is a hybrid and not a species for a reason. Your definition if I understand correctly relating to phylogeny in taxonomy that classifies organisms base on closely related characteristics. So you assume that because there are shared characteristics in the tree of life taxonomy of generations that the said species have a common ancestor. Do we have empirical evidence of this? Is there any physical evidence to show these ancestral lineages? I believe taxonomy to be a great way of grouping organisms in a way to understand common characteristics of organisms but I still have issue with the assumption that an organism of one species is the inherent ancestor of another species. We don't have evidence of one species evolving into another species in the fossil record or in todays timeline. It's a definition that proves to much.

Vor 2 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Gary CLark Definition from your most recent comment (my emphasis): " a category of biological classification ranking immediately below the genus or subgenus, comprising related organisms or *populations* potentially capable of *interbreeding*" Definition from your previous comment: "the ability to reproduce viable offspring" You'll notice that the Webster's definition indicates that it is referencing populations, delimited by potential interbreeding within that population. Your definition makes no indication of populations or how to delimit within. By your definition, every fertile organism is a separate species, which would obviously be nonsense. The Webster's definition, as it happens, is also wrong since it would mean there are no species of bacteria, which is obviously nonsense. And it would mean that paddlefish and sturgeons are the same species, in spite of being in different families. They would have been better to say something like: "a category of biological classification ranking immediately below the genus or subgenus, comprising related organisms or populations [sharing some set of characteristics, (e.g. the ability to interbreed).]" There are many common species concepts in biology, and none are universally accepted. Webster's decided to use only one of them, which is problematic, but then again they are not writing for a scientific audience. "What is your definition." Species are hypotheses that populations delimited by some metric(s) are monophyletic with respect to ancestry, and that no monophyletic subclade(s) of those populations can be delimited by the same metric(s). The resulting population's monophyly can then be tested by other delimitation metrics producing either concordant or discordant results. "Now I think that your just saying stuff to say stuff." Language is a tricky thing, and must be used with care. Especially when discussing complex topics. I use my words in very specific ways to convey very specific meanings, and I assume that others do the same. It is possible I did not respond to the meaning you intended but I can only respond to the meaning I understand, not necessarily the one you intend.

Vor 3 Tage
Gary CLark
Gary CLark

@Crispr CAS9 websters dictionary : a category of biological classification ranking immediately below the genus or subgenus, comprising related organisms or populations potentially capable of interbreeding, and being designated by a binomial that consists of the name of a genus followed by a Latin or latinized uncapitalized noun or adjective agreeing grammatically with the genus name. What is your definition. Now I think that your just saying stuff to say stuff.

Vor 3 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Gary CLark "definition of a species is the ability to reproduce viable offspring" That is not a definition of species at all, and certainly not the way the word is used in biological science. "I would argue there is proof in science or rahter evidence if you want to call that" Since proof and evidence are not synonyms, this is not a question of preference. One is correct, the other isn't. There is no proof in science. "organized randomly through mutation in a way to create vision." The organization is by selection, which is non-random. Mutations just produce the variation that selection can act on. "how do we know it's random" Because we know how mutations work, to a reasonable degree of accuracy. "Could it not be hormonal?" Hormonal differences can cause differences in fitness, but what causes the differences in hormones? To the best of my knowledge, all differences in hormones are either differences in genetics or differences in environment acting on genetics. And here we are talking about a subset of the population with a differential hormonal response when exposed to the same environment as the rest of the population, so it can *only* be the underlying genetics that explains it. "or that the organism sensing something is changing" Let's say this, or any of the rest of what you suggest happens: the question is 'how is it happening in *some* members of the population and not others?' Is there an answer other than genetics available?

Vor 4 Tage
Chris M
Chris M

Still waiting. When did bacteria have gain in function/information and become a dog? Nowhere in the world does that occur. Besides all fossils having soft cell tissues in them is clear and abundant evidence evolution does not occur. There are not enough trillions and quadrillions of years for "mutations" required to have gained in function as soft cell tissues have how long a life? Your experiment does nothing but proves the existence of a "pre-programmed will to survive" or immunity as your body posses. Mankind did not evolve from apes or will they evolve into something other than humans. Transitional fossils? Where?

Vor 10 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Chris M "That is the events evolution proposes." No, it isn't.

Vor 10 Tage
Chris M
Chris M

@Crispr CAS9 That is the events evolution proposes.

Vor 10 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"When did bacteria [...] become a dog?" If bacteria became dogs, that would disprove evolution. You understand that, right?

Vor 10 Tage
Vinícius M
Vinícius M

E.Colocaust :(

Vor 10 Tage
Chris Carriere
Chris Carriere

Isn't it possible to try and make bacteria evolve into eating stuff we treat as garbage ? Like idk all the "bad" gases etc. Could solve a lot of problems

Vor 10 Tage
Stephanie Hyatt
Stephanie Hyatt

I hate to mention this, but unless you are composting your paper towels, use re-usable microfiber cloths that you can throw in the washer. I use them occasionally, but rarely for cleaning.

Vor 10 Tage
Ismael Abufon
Ismael Abufon

12:31 ... I 100% read Gattaca haha

Vor 11 Tage
Ismael Abufon
Ismael Abufon

The lucky 1% gets to reproduce..... like the super rich haha

Vor 11 Tage
Peter Smoyer
Peter Smoyer

Space itself is the thing that is evolving. All the matter, energy and radiation that exists in the universe at one time fit into something the size of a soccer ball or perhaps a football stadium. It all came from space. It is all here to benefit space. Space would not be as expansive as it is without the matter and energy it created in less than one second.

Vor 11 Tage
Antisocial Atheist
Antisocial Atheist

I could sit down and talk with that guy for days lol. Very interesting and informative. If I could meet him I'd have to thank him for his work

Vor 11 Tage
Plum Amazing
Plum Amazing

The best example of this kind of research is a really old story by the author of 'Game of Thrones' George R.R Martin. It's one of his best. It's a short story called 'Sandkings'. There is the book on youtube. Also the outerlimits video also on youtube. Sorry I can't put up links you'll have to search youtube. Very scary one to read. I suspect you will like it. muhahaha

Vor 11 Tage
Falsimer
Falsimer

When the music kicked in I got a wave of nostalgia. I saw your source, but what it reminded me of was the Majora's Mask Milk Bar Theme. The most simultaneously upbeat and sorrowful music I can think of right now. Only the first 5 or so notes of your music matched the Theme, but it was enough to spark my memory.

Vor 11 Tage
Benjamin Márkus
Benjamin Márkus

that transfer process was suprisingly lax! :o i would’ve thought you’d want to do this under suction cabinet with purified atmosphere and such.

Vor 11 Tage
sokin jon
sokin jon

“33 years ago, even on weekends ever since ..” Bacteria are annoyingly hard workers.

Vor 11 Tage
mbbs2008
mbbs2008

Perhaps this is adaptability? Quiet possible that bacteria have different (higher) adaptability potential then higher animals?. The bacteria still remained "bacteria" at the end, even after 30 years relentless "experimentation", and did no really "evolve" into a new species? Am I missing something?

Vor 11 Tage
mike powers
mike powers

This is a great experiment in micro evolution and also acts as an experiment in macro evolution as well, if macro evolution were possible there would be signs after 70k generations but, that is not the case. No matter how resilient or mutated these samples are they are still E. coli bacteria and not E. coli/??? Or something completely different.

Vor 12 Tage
sokin jon
sokin jon

stove, etc. It's WAY too wasteful to use paper towels! SHAME on you, for promoting such wastefulness!!

Vor 11 Tage
jonnyjazzz
jonnyjazzz

So this is what Chase is doing these days. Decided he liked the red-head look, too.

Vor 12 Tage
Emmanuel N
Emmanuel N

Evolution really isn't true devolution or decay is much more realistic

Vor 12 Tage
Tom James
Tom James

Where are the damn gloves?

Vor 12 Tage
Máté Ócsai
Máté Ócsai

This video was amazing. I was hooked from the beginning.

Vor 12 Tage
Roberto Serrini • The Travelclast
Roberto Serrini • The Travelclast

bounty blew my mind

Vor 12 Tage
Ad Lakerveld
Ad Lakerveld

It seems dangerous to me learning bacteria to survive antibiotics

Vor 12 Tage
X17
X17

This is a perfect plot for a disaster movie

Vor 12 Tage
X17
X17

why 42 though?

Vor 12 Tage
betaneptune
betaneptune

This is the great experiment Richard Dawkins describes in his book _The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution_!

Vor 12 Tage
Ezgi Umut
Ezgi Umut

As far as I understand the environment in this experiment is strictly controlled with constant and optimal temperature and nutritional content. There are no other species present. E.coli to grow faster in such an environment is most likely explained by the fact that these bacteria evolve to spend less energy and time to adapt to different temperatures, nutritional shortages (ex. storing carbohydrates), and competing with other species, allowing them to concentrate all metabolic activity on growth and reproduction. Thus, the "constant improvement" proposed by the researcher is questionable. This is probably not an improvement, it is only an action of increasing the activity of only one vital metabolic function (growth by using glucose) at the expense of others (adaptation to temperature, nutritional shortage, competition, etc.).

Vor 12 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Ezgi Umut "My comment is not a claim" Yes it is. You claimed that something was the most likely explanation, you must support this. You've also made a collection of claims in your new comment, and provided support for none of them. You're just making stuff up, no one cares.

Vor 10 Tage
Ezgi Umut
Ezgi Umut

@Crispr CAS9 My comment is not a claim, rather a necessary discussion before accepting that this experiment provides evidence to "continuous improvement" in a stable environment. I consider that it should be called continuous adaptation to the experiment's growth medium. The first generation E.coli of this experiment comes from the real world where it spent significant energy to preserve membrane potential to the changing electrolyte concentrations of its habitat, to adapt to temperature changes and nutritional content as well as producing multiple enzymes to produce energy from many non-glucose substrates. The hospitable and stable environment provided in this experiment is expected to result in selective atrophy of the aforementioned metabolic features of the bacterium that it gained to survive harsh living conditions; allowing more energy to be spent on growth and reproduction rather than metabolic defensive buffers, competition, etc. The researcher has to disprove this interpretation before concluding that continuous improvement takes place even in stable conditions. These bacteria are still adapting to this new friendly habitat (no fluctuations in sodium, phosphate, potassium, magnesium, citrate, ammonium concentrations, temperature, nutrition ) even if it has been going on for 30 years (which is not a long time) especially considering that it is markedly different from what the bacteria have evolved in millions of years. The atrophy of previously essential functions with environmental change has been described in many species even in vertebrates in Galapagos.

Vor 10 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

@Ezgi Umut " It is more likely that the outcome (growth rate) is better not because of progress, but rather from the atrophy of other metabolic functions that are necessary for life in the real world" This is your claim, present your evidence to support it.

Vor 12 Tage
Ezgi Umut
Ezgi Umut

@Crispr CAS9 the ability to grow without glucose (ex. metabolizing citrate) is a different discussion that takes place during the video. However, the main topic of interest that the researcher emphasizes at the conclusion is the constant improvement of the growth rate which concerns the bacteria incubated at the standard DM25 liquid medium (10% glucose). It is more likely that the outcome (growth rate) is better not because of progress, but rather from the atrophy of other metabolic functions that are necessary for life in the real world, that have become obsolete in this experiment method.

Vor 12 Tage
Crispr CAS9
Crispr CAS9

"it is only an action of increasing the activity of only one vital metabolic function (growth by using glucose)" The interesting finding is that are able to grow in the complete absence of glucose. Are you sure you watched the video?

Vor 12 Tage
hoiy vinosa
hoiy vinosa

“33 years ago, even on weekends ever since ..” Bacteria are annoyingly hard workers.

Vor 12 Tage
Blue Five
Blue Five

I'm put in mind of 'The Outer Limits' episode 'Wolf 359'.

Vor 12 Tage
Soapy's Thoughts
Soapy's Thoughts

This reminds me of Primer

Vor 12 Tage
Yout Funny
Yout Funny

Evolution is Adaptation Adaptability

Vor 12 Tage
hoiy vinosa
hoiy vinosa

i just love the hippie labcoat at 11.50 :-) ....sadly not gonna happen in my lab :-(

Vor 12 Tage
Mary Ann Bittle
Mary Ann Bittle

Paper towels? Um, NO. Dish cloths, hand towels, sponges, all can be - get this - *WASHED* to sanitize them. No need, at ALL, to waste trees in order to wipe down the counter, stove, etc. It's WAY too wasteful to use paper towels! _SHAME on you,_ for promoting such wastefulness!!

Vor 13 Tage

Nächster

Turbulent Flow is MORE Awesome Than Laminar Flow

18:32

How to Slow Aging (and even reverse it)

21:10

How to Slow Aging (and even reverse it)

Veritasium

Aufrufe 3 200 000

How One Supernova Measured The Universe

13:42

How One Supernova Measured The Universe

Veritasium

Aufrufe 2 600 000

Bryant Myers - Airdrop (Official Music Video)

3:26

Bryant Myers - Airdrop (Official Music Video)

BryantMyersVEVO

Aufrufe 744 460

Hermitcraft 8: Episode 9 - BASE PROGRESS!

23:13

The Infinite Pattern That Never Repeats

21:12

The Infinite Pattern That Never Repeats

Veritasium

Aufrufe 11 000 000

Why You Should Want Driverless Cars On Roads Now

18:08

These Pools Help Support Half The People On Earth

19:24

Can Humans Sense Magnetic Fields?

13:53

Can Humans Sense Magnetic Fields?

Veritasium

Aufrufe 2 400 000

The Richness of Time

1:29:38

The Richness of Time

World Science Festival

Aufrufe 1 900 000

A Physics Prof Bet Me $10,000 I'm Wrong

17:56

A Physics Prof Bet Me $10,000 I'm Wrong

Veritasium

Aufrufe 6 900 000

This is why we can't have nice things

17:30

This is why we can't have nice things

Veritasium

Aufrufe 8 600 000

Life hack 💸👻 #shorts by PavloBobo

0:10

Life hack 💸👻 #shorts by PavloBobo

PavloBobo

Aufrufe 4 153 102

Schmeckt das? - MyEy bei "Die Höhle der Löwen"

22:24

Joey Jordison: 1975 - 2021

8:32

Joey Jordison: 1975 - 2021

Slipknot

Aufrufe 954 065