The manuscript is turkish ahmet ardic decifered the astrology and calendar chapter. Why wont they acknowledge their discoveries years ago !

@Yesmister Noawmenace The fact that their nonsense has been available for years and NOBODY has found it worthy of study is proof enough, unless you are thick as a plank as you seem to be. What I find funny is that instead of you yourself showing me why you believe the Ardics are worthy of the time of day you simply attack my position. This clearly indicates to me that you have nothing.

@palimpsestransparent "serious journals have reviewed" Source on that? Links, articles etc. "Proof enough" for you is clearly not proof enough for me. The hypocrisy of someone who has done nothing but throw around ad hominem attacks and straw man arguments talking about "scholarliness" is amusing.

@Yesmister Noawmenace I already stated that serious journals have reviewed and will not consider their "findings" as worthy at all, to the point that they are not wasting their time with them. No other scholar even mentions this nonsense. This is proof enough for me. What is your proof beyond lapping up the Ardic family's OWN statements regarding all these wonderful "discoveries" they have made? Is your only source Youtube, specifically the Ardic family's youtube channel? Is that your level of scholarliness?

@palimpsestransparent Look who is telling me that I have "nO sOLiD aRgUmEnTs". Where are your solid arguments and proof?

@Yesmister Noawmenace Lol, so you have no proof of anything. You attack me because you have no solid arguments.

ITS DECODED ALREADY BY , Ahmet Ardic and his sons, SEARCH ON YOUTUBE

@Kithro Games To me Ahmet translation make sense. Anyway we see in future if Ahmet is right.

Unconfirmed

The Ahmet "theory" is complete nonsense. Not worth mentioning.

The reason for this is because they made this documentary few months before they started working on it

I am kinda surprised they dont want to mention their works

Con man thoo

I would buy the knock off no problem

Its Covid 19 medicine

If i was paid, i might be able to decode it if anything is earthly made. When i was younger i used to code text messages easy, i just have to tell the destiny coding structure and was easy as that, but for others that text meant nothing and rubbish. I send and receive letters to my girlfriend from prison, and others thought that is just kind of nice underline or border paintings.

Cheap medieval con. Easy money out of thin air. 99% probability.

That is practically impossible It hs all the characteristics of a language and it even follows Zips law even though it predates that concept. It's most likely (in my opinion) that it's the sole surviving document of a culture long since forgotten.

Atlantis

We can carbon date the paper but that doesn’t necessarily mean it was made when the paper was made. But we do know it was after the paper was made lol

@Maddy Gordon I don't understand your comment at all

Maddy Gordon it’s not made of paper. It’s from animal hide.

Ahmet Ardic and his sons are on the process of deciphering it.

@Yesmister Noawmenace You are simply recounting the Ardic family's version of events. Can you point me to any independent source that recounts these events? Or any independent source that gives any type of creditiblity to their "translations" of the text? I don't think anybody is "gatekeeping" anything. The multiple scholars involved in cracking the manuscript are many and varied and all are indpendent, but you cannot expect scholares to give away time to all these hundreds of bogus theories from amateurs. And you cannot expect a serious academic journal to waste time having to justify why it is not even going to consider publishing a collection of amateur musings.

@palimpsestransparent Ardic family tried to publish it in a well-known linguistics journal, it got rejected, then they asked the peer-reviewers if their rejection correspondence can be shared in public with their name and the reviewers rejected that too. 2 reviewers who don't want their names and their reasoning for academic rejection to be known in public, I wouldn't trust such a peer-review. They are probably trying to gatekeep this to their own profession.

@. how is what a bad thing?

@palimpsestransparent And how is that a bad thing?

@Lester Industry? Don't be ridiculous. If you imagine scholars basking in money you are truly clueless. The only thing that is bogus is a "theory" supposedly so solid that it is only published on youtube

how can a man be allowed to handle a 600 year old book with his bare hands?

He's holding a facsimile, not the original! The original is locked in Yale university

Maybe he is holding the perfectly made replica version? I think they mentioned that the real one is in Yale University,

It's old Turkish language, they already translated it.

@fnersch I am curious, is there any more info on who determined it to be bogus?

Frederick Alfredo Cabral yea it’s bogus

Turned out to be bogus.

They've already figured this out two nuns wrote this you guys are running a little behind aren't you.... I looked at the date on a video maybe I'm the one running a little behind or ahead I guess I should say

What can you tell me the where this info is from

It's available as PDF to everyone. How does an overpriced reproduction help cracking it ?

@Ionut Radoi it's just a high quality reproduction.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-48284012

Probably not a lot, but it would be a nice thing to have if you are rich. I suppose it could help you get in the mind of the author. Obviously it can't be a perfect facsimile as they would have to have used 15th vellum amongst other things like it looking the same under multispectral imagining.

the truth of the VM wqtch video till end : https://youtu.be/F7Gk4ce_r_U

VOYNICH IS IMPROPERLY CALLED "MANUSCRIPT", PLEASE WATCH: LETTERS CONTAINER SYSTEM & STENCILS WORKING https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr9HM5Pi3wM Maybe now you also have understood how Voynich was written... Now all my video have ENGLISH SUBTITLES, SOTTOTITOLI IN ITALIANO, SUBTÍTULOS EN ESPAÑOL!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4E3BgWiqtk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF8LVn4HVh4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyNXPRu7K80 I did my bit, now you have to do your's there should be someone who can access Voynich and can take and share a close photo!