Copyright © 2012-2019 DE-filmFilme, Clips - kostenlos ansehen, online teilen
Joe Rogan talks about the reason why he changed his stance on the Moon landing conspiracy theory. Featuring Arian Foster.Taken from Joe Rogan Experience #928
If the moon landing was faked, the USSR would’ve let every body in the world know
Squidbilly like they let the world know about 911, who killed Jeffrey Epstein? Etc? Israel bush Cheney did 911 the Russians say anything?
If track record means anything ... the whole moon landing story is exactly that --> A STORY ... The government consistently LIES to achieve the hidden agenda ... Everything we/ve been taught is a lie (one example: the federal reserve ... it's NOT FEDERAL and there is NO RESERVE) ...
Hurrdurr is a mocking way of referring to someone being a complete moron. YOU are the one hurring and durring. So congrats, ya played yourself.
@seigeengine "Hurrdurr" is the sound of laughter coming from someone with half a brain. (And the half a brain is VERY conditioned by DeepState propaganda ...)
I don't really care who killed Kennedy. By debris hitting the third building, which caught on fire and burned for hours uncontrolled. Hurrdurr.
@seigeengine ??? Who killed Kennedy ??? ??? How is it that two planes knockdown THREE buildings ???
Track record? Prove the government lies more than tells the truth and you might have an argument. And no, the federal reserve has federal oversight and serves the function of holding the reserves of banks around the country. Of course, in modern times, money systems are more complex, but the general function remains the same.
Papercip... there is many of us descended from. Facts
What would the purpose be of faking a moon landing? In 1969. I was 9 when it happened and watched much of it on tv. The ramifications would be catastrophic if they tried something like that. Not to mention the amount of people that would have had to be involved. Launch facilities, tens of thousands of people who worked in the facilities, the rockets, the astronauts etc...the people who think it was faked are ignorant idiots.
Your a Sellout !
Film did get damaged, you'd just inform security and they'd manual inspect them.
Yes. It depends on what film though. Not all film is susceptible. Also, x-rays and charged particle radiation are different things.
Who just came here from the video where Joe Rogan decides the Earth is flat after all?
The "space walk" is also known as EVA or extra vehicular activity.
If we didn’t go to the moon then where did those rocks come from?
While I believe the USA did, indeed, land astronauts on the moon, we didn't need to go into space to get extraterrestrial rock - just ask a meteorite collector :)
JRE: Do your audience and yourself a favor and do a show on this law that Trump just past this year: 42 USC 18321: Human space flight beyond low-Earth orbit ; laws in effect on October 16, 2019 From Title 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE ; CHAPTER 159-SPACE EXPLORATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND SCIENCESUBCHAPTER II-EXPANSION OF HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT BEYOND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION AND LOW-EARTH ORBIT§18321. Human space flight beyond low-Earth orbit And let's discuss the Congressional Finding of fact in this law (a)(1) which proves No government has ever been to the moon via spacecraft....And if you don't do a show on this revelation that clearly proves it wasn't a conspiracy theory, well, I suppose that'll say alot for your viewers. Just saying....
We placed objects on the moon which can be seen with a telescope.
Nope. Nothing we left on the Moon can be seen by any telescope.
The Russians would have called out the Americans if they never made the moon landing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhp-FTYSGe8 There ya go. Solved.
Joe "Operation Paperclip" Rogan
JRE...NO...WE HAVE NOT BEEN TO THE MOON VIA SPACESHIP....the legislation signed into law by Trump this year makes that clear. We STILL do not have the technology to pass thru the van allen belts...FAKE MOON LANDING IS NO LONGER A CONSPIRACY THEORY! See Below Congressional finding (a)(1) for confirmation. 42 USC 18321: Human space flight beyond low-Earth orbit Text contains those laws in effect on October 16, 2019 From Title 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 159-SPACE EXPLORATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND SCIENCESUBCHAPTER II-EXPANSION OF HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT BEYOND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION AND LOW-EARTH ORBIT §18321. Human space flight beyond low-Earth orbit (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The extension of the human presence from low-Earth orbit to other regions of space beyond low-Earth orbit will enable missions to the surface of the Moon and missions to deep space destinations such as near-Earth asteroids and Mars. (2) The regions of cis-lunar space are accessible to other national and commercial launch capabilities, and such access raises a host of national security concerns and economic implications that international human space endeavors can help to address. (3) The ability to support human missions in regions beyond low-Earth orbit and on the surface of the Moon can also drive developments in emerging areas of space infrastructure and technology. (4) Developments in space infrastructure and technology can stimulate and enable increased space applications, such as in-space servicing, propellant resupply and transfer, and in situ resource utilization, and open opportunities for additional users of space, whether national, commercial, or international. (5) A long term objective for human exploration of space should be the eventual international exploration of Mars. (6) Future international missions beyond low-Earth orbit should be designed to incorporate capability development and availability, affordability, and international contributions. (7) Human space flight and future exploration beyond low-Earth orbit should be based around a pay-as-you-go approach. Requirements in new launch and crew systems authorized in this chapter should be scaled to the minimum necessary to meet the core national mission capability needed to conduct cis-lunar missions. These initial missions, along with the development of new technologies and in-space capabilities can form the foundation for missions to other destinations. These initial missions also should provide operational experience prior to the further human expansion into space. SEE ALSO YOU TUBE VIDEO titled: The Final Frontier: Astronauts on ISS tell euronews about humanity's future in Space March 16, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cBrnIyeEwI
@seigeengine u stupid fuck.. If u had the a ability to punch my dick 75 years ago and coming to me to punch my dick was a needed mission for u and other assholes like urself (other givernments) because it was promoted to tax payers that their billions of dollars spent on a toy ship/tool to punch me in the dick was justified because (pioneering in space) to punch me in the dick is the future, it would make no sense that you would have to wait another 15, 20, 75 years later and then sign into law today authorizing the ability to get money to go back to punch me in the dick again and extend ur ability to do more than that? Wouldnt u and whoever else who find it financially justified and historically important for the future to punch me in the dick have used $ to do more than punch me In the dick already? Why wait? Why hasnt ur tool/craft to punch me in the dick more advanced? Wheres the progress? Bcuz the law just signed by the Prez is saying it wants money now to make it possible for u to punch me in the dick AND To go beyond punching me in the dick...obviously u didnt get the job done the first time....but then again, u urself are a dick... And I can no longer justify talking to a dick that had to wait 75 years or so to do it again...and not only are u a dick, clearly u need to grow a pair. Stop embarrassing yourself. This convo is over. Bye dick
If I travel to you, punch you in the dick, and then leave, I will have to travel back to you to punch you in the dick again. If I said I had to extend my presence to your location to enable dick-punching missions, that would not imply I had not punched you in the dick the first time. As for the technology bit, that's easy. Say I drove to your location the first time, and then between then and now I had sold my car... I would have to reacquire that technology (a car) in order to get to you again, or I'd have to develop some other means of doing so (buying a plane ticket, train, whatever). Except NASA doesn't use cars, they use multi-billion dollar small-production run machines that they are the only customer for. So when NASA stops buying those rockets and spacecraft, they stop being made. That means the people are diverted to other projects or let go. The facilities are respec'd to something else, or decommissioned. The equipment used goes away. The supply chains are lost. Flash forward fifty years and those employees are all dead or retired, their skills have been made redundant by improved manufacturing technology, and the parts used aren't even manufactured anymore. That means it doesn't even make sense to try to use the old designs.
@seigeengine Then save me a trip to the hospital and explain to me how I misinterpreted that "finding of fact"..or simply tell me what u think it means...why do u always make a comment but u dont support ur own rebuttle?...maybe u just like to argue or like to infer u know enough without explaining urself. Sounds like a pathology to me...I dont think u can...and unless u can, plz stop posting empty comments.. we're suppose to be learning from eachother...educate me if u can...
No, it does not do that. That is a blatant misinterpretation so vast that if someone I knew made it, I'd be immediately concerned whether they needed to be rushed to the hospital.
@seigeengine IT ABSOLUTELY BACKS UP MY ASSERTIONS.......Perhaps I provided too much text in my post and you got lost in translation or maybe you aren't familiar with how US legislation is enacted and becomes law, but what I presented to support my FACTUAL assertion that NO ONE FROM THIS PLANET HAS EVER LEFT LOWER EARTH ORBIT OR TRAVELED TO THE MOON IN A SPACESHIP was a US Congressional FINDING OF FACT which can only be used to create law...FACTS.....and the very 1st Finding of Fact was (see above)(a)(1)The extension of the human presence from low-Earth orbit to other regions of space beyond low-Earth orbit WILL ENABLE MISSIONS TO THE SURFACE OF THE MOON and missions to deep space destinations such as near-Earth asteroids and Mars. That Finding of Fact makes it clear NO ONE has been to the Moon by current spacecraft/technology....If we had been ENABLED TO TAKE MISSIONS TO THE MOON SINCE THE NOW INFAMOUS MOON LANDING HOAX of 1969, Trump would not have had to sign into law a finding of fact that supports and provides for tax payer dollars-funding for the space program so that the US can now be ENABLED TO TRAVEL TO THE MOON or go beyond lower earth orbit. And the video link I also included in my post are 2 US astronauts that clearly state and admit on camera that we have never traveled passed lower earth's orbit because of the Van Allen belt radiation. As well, this finding of fact also serves to confirm my assertions as to how it is actually happening that extraterrestrial UFOs enter earth and how it is possible that humans have been and are already on the moon, mars, etc. But hey, I've done my research...I suggest before you reply to a post that presents factual evidence and confirmation of a topic, you do some actual thinking or verification to support your bullshit comment that I did not back up my assertions...at least state how or why I didn't back it up and what factual confirmation do you have to support your assertion that my assertions weren't supported. Dude, if you're one of those people who need to feel safe in the tiny box the government has put you in and requires you not too question reality or in your face evidence, then go fishing, pop open a beer and shut the fuck up. Wake up People!
Watching two ignoramuses discuss conspiracy theories is fun
Hubertous, A new name that the chocolates will start naming their children.
Joe 'We never went to the moon. And also the Earth is flat' Rogan.
@Methadras meth man yes it is
@cam Mitch That's not remotely funny, Deshawn.
@Methadras meth is in your name I know your stuff lol
@cam Mitch Okay DeShawn Javeyleus-Uumbugwa
Why is everyone forgetting "the burden of proof"? It's not up to us to prove its fake; NASA should prove the landing.
Lighting, Gravity, Scope, accuracy when checked against data they couldn't have had at the time. Have you seen any sci fi films from the era? There's also that we know the signals were transmitted to Earth from the Moon... but also, there's no reason not to believe them. NASA has provided mountains of evidence. There has not been a single valid debunking of that evidence in the generations that have come since the landings, so it doesn't matter about your what ifs and maybes. You have no evidence. There is not a single scrap of proof on your side of the argument. You are entirely relying on emotional appeals and misdirection. I didn't say it was just you, so you are the liar. Congrats, you played yourself.
@seigeengine I mean you say they're proof but what about them couldn't be recreated on a set? It's not just me, liar.
@Gypsy Washington The videos are adequate. You being unconvinced isn't significant. You are not significant. No, they could not.
@seigeengine Those videos suck. They aren't convincing. PS I don't believe we've never landed on the moon at all but the videos with Neil Armstrong could easily be fake.
Shame they didn't debate the various specific inconsistencies
In order to do that, they'd have to know something about them beyond the claims.
"He was a Nazi!! He was a fucking Nazi!!"😂😂 Rogan MEANT that shit!!!
There was a space race with the USSR, they did go, but they were worried about putting out material at opportune moments to steer propaganda during the space race where we wanted to assert space technology dominance
Just another example of the idiocracy we live in that this is even a thing. The U.S. and NASA helped put humans on the moon. Stop being so stupid and ignorant. The holocaust happened. JFK was killed by LHO with no help. Elvis is dead, and the Bigfoot doesn't exist. Fucking morons.
Dam you must be right, I mean the Russians were in on it as well .In fact Neil & buzz were KGB agents & that's why the ruskies went along with it, & as they blasted off the moon they changed the stars & stripes flag for the Hammer & sickle ! I True all true !
The commo equipment my dad designed that went to the moon is mounted in a reentry capsule at the Air and Space museum. It’s to the far right as you enter from the Mall side. Look inside. Up, and to the right. Looks like old stereo equipment. He once remarked that the hardest part of going to the moon is coming back. You can’t practice that aspect of the mission. We went to the moon. The Earth is round. Bitches be crazy. Halloween is coming.
NASA's done already admit that we can't go past the firmament cuz it's too much radiation
Not only were they bouncing around, but they were leaving completely undisturbed footprints in dust -right
Lol, undisturbed my ass. Stop making shit up and pretending you have an argument.
Rogen, why does the moon landing have to do with you? You where not born when this happened. Lots of things (caveman, civil war, ww1, ww2 ..) happened before you showed up. Your just another poorly educated talking head expounding bullshit.
What's the difference between the Nazis and the founding fathers slave owners? If they were alive today would they be punished for crimes against humanity?
Jogador15 what if questions are nonsense and waste of time. Your proposed and isn’t real never happened and never will
EVA...Extra Vehicular Activity=Space walk
Here is what happened: They sent a rocket to the moon, but it was a one way ticket. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were both actors. There was no video footage recovered as it could not be broadcast through vacuum. Instead, videos were doctored. It was a small enough circle that was in on it that they could all be held accountable for leaking it, knowing full well the consequences of doing so. So when they said they landed on the moon, they may have been right, but it was full of deception right from the get-go.
@Wise Bluehillwarrior I mean, sure, but that isn't license to just make everything up. Next you'll be repeating the "rockets don't work in space" nonsense, or claiming that the Moon isn't solid, or that the Earth is flat.
@seigeengine Well. Guess i had bad teachers. Besides my teacher told me a bunch of things i later found out were disproven/false, so i take most facts with a grain of salt. Many facts in science are just really good theories/possibilities anyway.
"are supposedly a form of light" You're seriously failing middle school science here, mate. We shouldn't have to correct you on the basics literally everyone in society is taught.
@Neil Lobo Aye. Was just a guess i just came up with on the spot, with fuzzy details. Turns out radio-waves are supposedly a form of light, since it can travel through space, which other waveforms can not. For example sound. No need to lose your shit. An educative correction would do.
This phone/PC you are typing this stupid theory on is possible to share because of something call the interconnected network. There are atomic clock based satellites above in the orbit that help you navigate traffic every single day. Radio waves were discovered more than a century back. You really think information can't be transmitted through vacuum?? 😐🤦♂️ For fucks sake man.. if you do not have the brain to study or grasp the concept of elementary science, atleast have the decency to respect someone who has for a living. Every bum who works at a fucking Walmart nowadays watches some videos online and tries to spew their "knowledge" here. Well if you are so worried about this "big lie" being told to you, then please go ahead and enrol your self into a science program. Perhaps that may help instil some sanity into you. Cause right now it seems that you nicely sit and enjoy all the benefits of this technology, but are not willing to accept how far we have come in space science. I don't dispise your theory. I despise that people like you sit on their arse and don't have the courage to collect data on their claims. Similar to the flat Earth fucknuts. They read and watch a bunch of stupid things online and come here to elaborate on "what they think". Instead of leading their boring ass, miserable lives everyday, they think believing in some nonsense like this makes them feel, well, "different from the rest". So please stop giving your two cents and get back to whatever shit y'all do in your life.
You would think that the Russians would have say something if they discovered that it was fake, you can triangle-late where the radiosignal are coming from and the astronaut dit used radio.
I used to really believe in this theory because of professor James Fetzer but now I think they probably did go to the moon😱
"In the early 1990s, Fetzer began to promote John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, later 9/11 conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories regarding the 2002 death of Senator Paul Wellstone and Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories since the multiple fatalities in 2012." Really? You're one of those?
Area 51 used to be a conspiracy
Not really. It wasn't publicly acknowledged by the government, but everyone knew it was there.
Joe “I debated a guy” Rogan
Joe Rogan. You went from someone who was talking about the truth to someone that is being controlled to lead us in a different direction. Everyone that is in the media, or anyone that can influence multitudes of people, even YouTube and Podcasts, are eventually silenced and controlled.
Think about this: at that time it was hard to get a decent landline phone connection, but yet they could communicate & see video of it🤷♂️. I dunno, it seems possible that they landed, but created the proof of it.
Dude, if that were the case then the voyagers and pioneers and so on were also faked?
Lol, what the fuck are you talking about? Color TVs were starting to be a thing at the time you daft fuck. Wireless communication was 70 years old by the time of the moon landings. That's longer ago then than the moon landings are from today.
@JRE Clips It's called EVA. EVA = Extravehicular activity
At one point, this made me think of "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon. Strangest novel I've ever read. But a good novel nonetheless.
Do we really give a shit what Joe’s opinion is on this is? Of course people fake things Joe, take your girl for instance 😂.
honestly you could probably waddle around and jump around both pretty easily on the moon, but if there isnt examples of both in different videos then idk
Basically Joe is a moron who is confused by them not having figured out how to move effectively in lunar gravity literally the first time any human had ever done it. They waddle around at first on Apollo 11 because they weren't sure how to do it. Armstrong figured out the hopping movement used later on and on all other missions, and the astronauts from then on were trained to do that.
Cmon they even rode Moonbuggies on Apollo 14. I mean it happened and the tracks are still up there to prove it. And the moon is round not flat. But your head might be flat if you think the earth is flat.
The thing that put me over the top was the nasa official saying is go to the moon in a nanosecond the problem is we destroyed that technology and we’re having problems duplicating it ... really 50 years of advancement and you can’t recreate the tent you flew to the moon in gtfoh.. I believe the moon landing happened as much as I believe pornhub when it tells me hot local girls want to have sex
The man you're talking about is Don Pettit. He's an astronaut who has served multiple missions on the ISS. The man has a doctorate in chemical engineering, and every moron going thinks they know better than him. What he's talking about is the hardware. Technology also means the physical equipment. We no longer have the equipment to go to the Moon. These are multi-billion dollar pieces of equipment that were only made for a short period of time, for one buyer, which stopped buying 50 years ago. The people who worked on this are dead. The parts used no longer are manufactured. The people who did all this work are retired or dead. Hell, manufacturing today relies on technologies they didn't have back then, so the skills they had to have back then to make things work without the same precision, computer modeling, or manufacturing techniques we use today basically don't exist to any extent anymore. We don't even have the infrastructure to support the equipment anymore since it was all converted for later projects. It's not that we can't do it again. It's that the old kit isn't available, we can't start making it again feasibly, and new kit hasn't been developed yet (well, they're working on it now, having already committed >$25B to it) You literally have no idea what you're talking about, but think you're a genius by sheer virtue of your emotional reaction to (let me guess) clips taken out of context of a man much smarter and more accomplished than you talking.
I only have one question that nobody has given me an answer to, forget all the conspiracies and why Stars cannot be seen etc etc. I want to know why there is NO photo of the Earth. (Not from a craft orbiter), from the Moon. I actually think there officially is one. Maybe Earth could not be seen.. nobody can answer my question.
Everybody with internet access can answer your question, Darren. There are many pictures of the Earth from the Moon. Literally hundreds of pictures of the Earth were taken across the Apollo missions.
Joe "south paw" Rogan On why he changed his stance
Moon landing was real......
It really is bizarre that somebody could believe we faked 6 manned missions to the moon. Maybe you could somehow fake 1 but you can't fake 6. They took hundreds of pictures and videos all showing the stages of the rockets and astronauts walking, digging, driving rovers, etc. and we brought back soil samples. We even left 5 retroreflectors that still reflect light back to us proving we were there. You just can't help people that believe this kind of nonsense.
This is so dumb they saved the nazi scientists for rocket propulsion and other weapon research nasa was always a front the Cold War was a front they were working together how can you you guys not know this in so disappointed
I hope Joe has since realized that pretty much every point anyone has ever made against the Moon Landing, including the footage he references right now, has been disproven by various experts in the required fields.
A big issue I have with moon landings is that since we entered an age of better technology, better cameras and better communication techniques ... We've never gone back ... These journeys were made at a time where video and picture quality was awful ... but we leave that era, things improve incredibly, but going back even once has never been considered? ... I think and hope we did actually go there ... but it's one of the conspiracies where I understand people being skeptic ...
The Apollo program cost ~$150B in today's money. Some of it would be cheaper today, but other things would be more expensive, especially if you want to make everything fancy and new. Do you really think the government is going to blow that on doing a repeat mission for no other reason than "lul new cameras?" The video was low quality, but serviceable. The picture quality was excellent. Film photography was already a well-developed technology at the time, and we switched to digital cameras not for quality, but efficiency/convenience. Digital cameras have basically always offered worse quality than film. Your points are stupid, basically.
Most of the Moon landing deniers simply would never admit that the white mans technology is so superior Fact is the footage was lost/destroyed passing thru the Van Allen radiation belt so the footage had to be reproduced on a Hollywood sound stage
Literally every single thing you just said was retarded.
There's no reason to go back. All we wanted was a rocket big enough to lift atomic bombs. von Braun was useful to us in the cold war.
I mean, this is a weird narrative. Their may have been some intent there, but we already had ICBMs at the time, and the longest range ICBMs are about 1% the weight of the rockets we used to get to the Moon. So they aren't really effective as weapons vehicles.
is dat jason derulo?
FILM NO SHIT I DIDNT THINK OF The CAMERA IN THE FILM Sense .ALL THE RADIATION THE FILM WOULD BE DONE UNLESS THE CAMERAS WERE MADE OF LEAD HUH
False. Different film is more or less sensitive. Different types of radiation. NASA tested all this to ensure it worked.
I'm a third way through and they NASA in Joe your own words said they faked it, what about 911 you know that was an inside job and the people responsible should be u know. the most deaths at the towers collapse were our men and women in blue and the firefighters. they got it the worst whole teams that lived in the fire house gone there's wife's died that day to. and them people live in the USA need to be exposed and dead sorry perry
JOE ROGAN I HOPE YOU GET THIS TEXT.there's one thing that proves we did not go to the moon and for surely did not land and take off of our moon. think vacuum cleaner or shop vac. the lander on the way down there hitting the thrust to slow down to find a spot to land but any any any kind of thrust will get sucked in to the perfect vacuum of space, and the rate of vacuum makes the propellant pushing the craft anyware because any kind of thrust gets sucked out like a gaggle of hookers sucking dick lol. serious I'm gonna watch this then tell you a how to check your self the power of a vacuum
seigeengine yes it's on YouTube ww2 unit 713. or 731 can't remember number exactly but they film some one in a vacuum chamber look it up
seigeengine I posted a new post for ya so everyone can watch
so your right sorry I didn't say my lamemans terms right yes your nuts would be flat because everything in them was sucked out including thrust as much as a rocket can push the vacuum of space can suck
@perry Sprint employeesRthehackers I'd prefer to look at the evidence, not movies, like you know, real cases where people were exposed to vacuums.
big time fan here too
When you see Elvis Presley and Jimi Hendrix in every background in this podcast series. You know this is legit.
Opp fish bowl
The gov doesn’t like you, govts have been killing and lying to the masses since their inception, they also have an unlimited amount of funding, there’s not much one can’t accomplish with time money and a plan and you people don’t understand that
lol, nonsense. Governments have finite resources and are subject to technological limitations. The bigger your plan, the longer the span of time, the more money is involved, the harder it is to hide.
Pretty interesting how usually the ones who just couldn’t Imagine the gov faking the moon landing are the same ones that don’t do five minutes of research to know that secret societies are running the world
Imagine thinking you understand the world because you Googled "secret societies" for five minutes.
Anyone who thinks that the moon landing is fake is an idiot
NBA on ESPN
Aufrufe 241 174
Aufrufe 979 712
Aufrufe 257 544
Aufrufe 180 455
Aufrufe 111 797
Aufrufe 3 295 075
Aufrufe 140 645
شوف دراما الثالثة - Shoof Drama 3
Aufrufe 223 871
Aufrufe 151 490
Aufrufe 1 783 005
The Daily Show with Trevor Noah
Aufrufe 2 269 930
Aufrufe 870 458