Karpov's ability to postpone the mate for so long deserves equal amount of credit

😂

Not equal

True, the longest I've ever resisted mate is 26 moves. Obviously counting from move 1.

@Michael Murray lol

@Michael Murray typical 400 elo moment

Kasparov against Karpov is honestly one of the best championship series ever (if not the best), Garry’s extremely sharp offense going against Anatoly’s almost impenetrable defense.

Karpov is not a defensive player remember that.

@Andreas Soteriou My bad, I just reckon that his defense is a bit similar to Petrosian’s.

When I first got into Chess, this set of games was the one that made me realize what an astounding game chess is

I evaluated this with a computer after that night sac move and it said it was a draw, then I proceeded to let it play and after a few moves it realized how bad the position is, that’s how you know Kasparov was a mastermind

@Ziad Mitwally It is possible. Sometimes computers don't understand very complicated and unbalanced position where a very large number of moves could theoretically be made

This comment is a bit old, but just curious, did you put it on a high depth?

@SpotlessPvP I think I let it run for about 30 seconds, so it was probably around 20-30 depth

@ThoseOneGuy Fyi 30 seconds is nothing compared to the prep GM's come in with these days. You need several days of very powerful computers and up to date software.

GarryKasparovBot = best chess move evaluator haha

So far, this is the most amazing chess game I've ever seen. It makes clear why Kasparov was the world's best for 15 years. This is a level of genius matched by perhaps only a few people to have ever played the game.

He also beat a computer, AND THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL GRANDMASTER FEDERATION.

20 not 15

It's actually 23

@NathanielZuraw what federation

@Haafingar have you watched kasporov vs the world?

Imagine the great chess that only exists in the minds of these legendary players and never happened.

You might enjoy checking out a Fred Reinhold book. His books always emphasize "open lines! open lines!" - just like this game. Reinhold comes up with forced combinations that are fantastic. His theory was based on increasing your number of available moves and he usually involved a sacrifice of some sort to kick things off. lots of fun.

yeah .. One of Fischer's greatest (immortal?) never finished cos opponent resigned before F could unleash the final part of a stunning combination; I understand that F (young at the time) was disappointed that he didn't get to play the moves!!

@Quirkasaurus Saurus Did you mean Reinfeld?

So you're telling me that he first took that pawn and then calculated like a god-like computer??? That's such a glorious display of talent.

This is not the type of thing a computer would do

That’s why they are grandmasters it’s insane

Nope it was his preparation. Because you see he played the move instantly

@Christopher Mendoza to compare a regular grandmaster to Kasparov or Karpov is like comparing Magnus to a chess engine.

Not his prep it was instinct you learn after training and playing so many games

The consistency of the people acknowledging Levy's consistency is admirable

I’d say by now the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging Levy’s consistency is admirable.

@JG I'd say by now the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging the Levy's consistency is admirable.

I'd say everyone in this reply section including the original comment Are admirable

@Anorak B Not only would I say by now the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging Levy’s consistency is admirable, but also I would say by now the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging the consistency of people acknowledging Levy’s consistency is also consistent.

The consistency of Levy's video uploads results in consistent comments about the consistency of Levy's video uploads, resulting in further consistency on the comments which comment on the consistency of the comments that comment on the consistency of Levy's video uploads, which in a word is admirable.

11:08 That little laugh from Gary when he moves the rook for the kill, is just fantastic😂😂

garry : ihihihihihih

I have replayed that part at least 10 times 😂 it's nice you mentioned it

Don't you just love seeing Kasparov's happiness at the incredible artistry of the position? Such a game and analysis! Thanks Levy!

This is the greatest, if not, one of the greatest video you'd ever done. Like seriously, this is just Oscar worthy. Thank you Levy for showing us this absolutely insane calculations done by the Great Kasparov. Truly, a masterpiece. 👏

Garry Kasparov literally blows my mind. It’s unbelievable, sad that I’m much too young to have seen this happening in real time

Me too,man. I started to read his books and studying his analysis and it's just beautiful to see a real genius working. One of the greatest players ever, for sure.

Hell I’m so young to watch this I can only say big brain.

that's funny. in real time, the Kasparov/Karpov matches were kind of boring because they drew so many games AND repeated 10+ moves from previous games. At one point in 85 they drew something like 9 games in a row. I remember opening up the sports pages in my newspaper, searching for the little chess article and going: "Another DRAW?!?!!?"

there was no internet in 1990, chess received scant media coverage, and no real time viewing unless you had tickets to the venue.

I've seen that video several times, but having it explained properly makes me appreciate it way more. Kasparov was just ridiculously good at chess. Levy please make more videos showcasing Kasparov's genius :D

I didn’t understand how grand master chess worked until this video. Kasparov consistently applied apocalypse level threats and Karpov always found the one move that minimized damage every time it looked over. Just shows how hard it is to pin down these great players even with perfect play

Yeah, I don't really understand the game until this video

Watch the whole documentary, it is around three hours long. Karpov's analyses are just as detailed.

The most amazing thing about world class chess is how minimizing damage isnt enough, in that whole sequence unless Kasparov blunders real bad Karpov had no chance of coming back into the game, and thats extremely surprising at world class chess because in a game that hasnt changed in 1000 years finding a move that has never been seen before that leads into 5+ winning sequences is just masterful. I wouldnt be surprised to see a situation where the enemy has no way of coming back in begginer or intermediate level chess, but in a game between GMs, seeing one doing something unheard of and the other actually taking the bait is mindblowing to me.

@StationaryEarth where is this documentary?

@StationaryEarth what documentary??????

I feel like you've brought me up from knowing nothing about chess to today where I understand enough to be able to appreciate how amazing this is.

Same here! And honestly, while I will strive to get better, getting that glimpse of how beautiful this game is is enough.

Gary probably had the greatest work ethic in chess, maybe only second to Fischer. Crazy how good he was in his prime.

This video was fantastic. You’re very talented at storytelling and captivating an audience; literally every video you put out is exciting and I look forward to each one.

And THIS is what made Kasparov the greatest of all time. Even without an in-depth analysis, his dynamic intuition basically gives him the "feeling" that with all of his pieces involved and pointing to the King-side, that he's winning. Only Alekhine had that level of dynamism in his thought process.

That was the absolute best compilation of the game, the players involved and breakdown from you and Kasparov. Please more Levy!

You may think Gary is arrogant or something like this, thats okay. But the joy in his voice, smile and laugh at 11:05, when he explains his genius calculation just shows how much he loves chess. He literally sound as pure and happy as a child. I really love it

Well said.

Anton Anton The point is that when people deserve to be arrogant but aren’t, they are seen as even greater, which is why people don’t like arrogance even when it’s deserved because it points to a kind of disagreeableness in personality.

There's a subtle difference between being confident about your abilities and being arrogant. And being pleased with something you do is not the same as arrogance. Kasparov wasn't being arrogant, he was just admiring the briliancy of his move, because as he explained, he didn't even understand all of it during the game. He'd probably be smiling just as much if the move had been played by anyone else. Don't forget, it was a gut move, which makes it even more briliant.

The problem is that if he was the loser of the game he wouldn't be able to comment on this game without being salty. He only enjoys chess and appreciates it when he wins

He definitely is ocky and hypercompetitive, definitely has earned the right to be

I also sacrifice pieces without thinking, and frequenly without even realising. But i don't win those games.

I once did a brilliant sacrifice without realising it. Truly brilliant. I had needed to make a bishop move to stabilize my pawns but something in my gut told me to wait. It was too late, my opponent took it with his knight but then I saw what I had done, A knight trap! There was one move to save the knight(he/she didn't spot it, neither had I and left the knight to die) then I took the knight. But while looking at the game afterwards, I found something so smart that even the CPU didn't spot.. haha. After the knight save, the knight would become useless due to no moves and I would have developed my rook, bishop and my knight in very powerful positions directly in my first 3 moves. Then that horse, my dear horsy, you would have died.

@Shambhav wow, thats amazing

@Shambhav yea..didn't understand but gg ))

It's ok little Luis 😊

Listening to Kasparov explaining his calculations is like entering entirely different, beautiful world. Artist's mind.

Yes, now there is Magnus who has reached a high level thanks to the engines, but Gary without an engine was at such a level, it's just incredible. Kasparov resisted as best he could until the victory of the machines

yeah,sad to say all GMs rely on engines.

@keikaruizawa6002  I wouldn't say they rely on them. Magnus without an engine would still be an incredible player, but with the engine ready he can enhance his skills and become even better. Is kasparov was as young as Magnus today he would in my opinion, be completely unstoppable due to being able to do the same thing as Magnus

@TuxTitan wdym using help of machines

@Kei Karuizawa Well they don't really rely on them, they train on them. Which is natural for all sports - when there are more advanced training techniques producing better results, not using them would be quite disadvantageous.

@Kei Karuizawa All sports are constantly evolving. Yes, engines did make chess much less artistic and romantic, but at the same time the level of chess we are at today is much higher than where we were before engines. And it's nothing new. Every generation of chess masters did that. The games played by Morphy and such are so beautiful and creative, but it's because they relied much less on theory since it wasn't so developed yet. That's just how it is. The reason the randomized chess variations are so popular today is because they kind of bring back the time when theory didn't exist.

I taught Kasparov this. Glad to see he applied it in a game.

💀

garry's analysis isnt him being a genius, its him seeing your vid and memorizing it from 30 years later levy.

underrated xd

Yeah, and Karpov clearly didn't take Levy's course, because if he did he wouldn't have played 1.e4 e5

@Franco Rios e4 e5 and white has forced mate in 74.

TENET reference since he saw from future?

@s jegannath gotham reference cos he says things like that a lot in his vids :)

I read somewhere that "no one at the time understood how dangerous ..f5 was". I think it's in a study of the Zaitsev Ruy Lopez where one of the chapters uses the K v K games as stems for variations. Anyway, after this game, Karpov switched to the non-suicidal ...c4. Because Kasparov is right - once the attacking position is there, it plays itself. I've seen enough Tal games to know it, Tolya knew it (just look at his face) and when Garry says "no thought at all - just look at the position", he's absolutely right.

Occasionally in life the stars align and this was one of those moments for Kasparov. You can see that he too is amazed at the elegance of the opportunities that presented themselves. It has all the hallmarks of a “white to play and mate in six” puzzle. Fantastic!

This is amazing. Started playing chess again in the last 6 months and I have to say, these are some of the most informative videos for any level. The explanation is direct, interesting and informative. A tonne of awesome videos and this is right up there to help understand some of the more "classical" theory. Keep it coming!

Amazing game and incredible calculations that came along with enjoyable explanations. Thanks for your videos Gotham Chess. You are amazing at explaining.

Thanks for doing this. It makes you realise how outrageously brilliant Kasparov was. And to do this against someone like Karpov is amazing

I don’t understand how he was able to see all these possible combinations after just one move. Absolutely insane

experience + lots of practice

he had stockfish engine hidden in lip balm

@Wojciech Krawczyk Except Kasparov is not a woman so he wouldn't have been accused of cheating. That lip balm story is hilarious.

@Brian Littrell poor Ana.... sexism at it best

@Isaac Orlich nice to know most people in chess don't see gender

Thanks mate this was brilliant. An amazing insight into the mind of a chess genius. Almost brutal to watch the control he had over that game. Unforgivable 😂

Great video. Love the combined analysis with the footage from Kasparov. Would love to see additional games between both of these world champions analyzed in detail. Your call of the game is always enthusiastic and entertaining.

I don't know much about Chess or Kasparov but his smile at 11:00 and smirk at 17:10 at his plans show EXACTLY how much he loves this game and that level of passion and in a sense, charisma about his own gameplay, is tremendous. This is why I love watching anybody compete at anything at the absolute highest level.

He is running “a lot” of lines in his head at the same time. And there not small lines either. Which is very impressive. It like whole sequences of moves are reduced to a single flash in his mind

I really enjoyed watching this video! I also learned so many techniques from the analysis of this game. I would love to see more videos like this. Garry thinks like a supercomputer. After watching this video and seeing the trailer for Garry's MasterClass, I am really tempted to watch his MasterClass lessons. But I wish that Gary's lessons will be offered as a standalone option because committing to an annual subscription is too much for me if I am only interested in Garry's lessons.

Only 15 minutes in and I'm in complete awe. I could maybe find one of these sequences if I devoted years of round the clock study to chess. Finding all of them is just pure genius.

Hey, look who’s here. Love your content. Surprised to see you at a chess channel

Do I sense Kasparov references coming in future videos? Somehow I do...

@NZA I'm always surprised that people are surprised haha

Wait what, you watch chess. Haha thats unexpected and yet p cool.

Do playing chess improves fight IQ?

This was part of a series of videos where Kasparov AND Karpov were both commenting on the decisive games in Lyon. And they were doing it in separate interviews so you got both sides of the story. Their analysis styles were quite different, and they disagreed on some points, while commenting on the psychology of the moves. Brilliant stuff. I was glad to have Levy play chess translator for me though. I saw the Kasparov video, but now I understand it.

This was a great video, I hope you continue to make more of these historical flashbacks and analyze the games

That was INSANE. Thank you so much for showing and explaining such, well genius is not too strong a word. All the best.

I think the taking with bishop move was quite reasonable. It'll be quite scary to not to make forcing move when you play against a very stong opponent

Wow, Garry Kasparov is certainly one of the best and smartest chess players of all time. He was so powerful in his prime.

This guy was running out of content, so he decided he would make the content himself and returned to competitive chess. Mad respekt

LoL

Lol

lol thought this was about to be a hate comment

Lmao

ya thats why he is analyzing past games

That was totally insane. He literally trapped nearly all of the black pieces in his mind. How can someone do that kind of calculations? It was terrific. 😅🙌

What a fantastic guy! I'm talking about YOU Levy! Love your work! Nobody else would've been able to narrate this game in a more just way! My fav Chess teacher 🤗

That is a great translation! Love your passion for the game. The chess community is so lucky to have you :)

Fantastic video. I don’t know how you keep pumping out such quality content, but it’s extremely impressive. Keep it up!

Garry was a dominating, aggressive most importantly extremely tactical.Garry's main weapon was his tactical ability out of nowhere.

It’s nice to see a young Kasparov smile at his cleverness. Brings a sense of joy to his gameplay which matches his also fiery nature. Thanks for walking through the calculations, kudos.

He is remembering how he brutally beat his greatest foe, of course he is smiling.

The problem with Kasparov is that he had a problem losing with grace and not being bothered by losing. He has too much of an ego. Which is why he would lose his inner peace and be bothered when he lost games.

@Brian Littrell he could never have become who he was without being bothered by losses to the point of obsession

@Brian Littrell there is no all time great of anything that was not angered, disappointed, and displeased with coming up short. The greats win, that’s why they are great

@Brian Littrell his rage drived him to last no.1 for 21 fucking years

You make great videos man and I watch every one of them till the very end. Your work entertained me and advanced my chess rating as well. Thank you and I hope you never stop.

came back to watch this again a year later. The game and Levy's breakdown and excitement are so good

This is simply amazing!! Kasparov was, in my opinion, the BEST calculator and World Champion..he was plain scary!

Kasparovs calculations are Just mesmerizing. Saw the clip before but couldnt keep up with his moves. Great content

The Kasparov - Karpov rivalry is the best thing ever happened in chess.

Nobody saw tactical combinations the way Garry did. Even Magnus said that he has not seen anybody so tactically dynamic in complex positions like Kasparov. Another terrific upload by Levy.

Considering Garry coached Magnus, I wouldn’t be surprised if in the future we see him begin to match his tactical complexity.

@Lark Mancer Kasparow vs. Karpow was so intense because they are complete opposites in chess. Garri truely believed a world champion must innovate and that every game shoul be an attempt to create a new piece of art, a new painting. He once said in an interview after one of this superoriginal games: "You have to be ready to get a bloody nose for that because it will take you 10 games to play 1 game like this." :O I've always felt it was too easy to write him down as arrogant. Yes, he sometimes had a prickish attitude, but he did respect his opponents. There is footage of him when, after a game, he analyses lines with his opponents and discusses problems, alternatives or gives advise. Kramnik once said it's ok that Kasparow could be impatient, mad or very confident at times, because he was world champion and had every right to special treatment with extra respect from "normal" players. Part of his chess was also far more psychological than Karpow. He once said in an interview "Why should I play something my opponent is familiar or comfortable with, when I can play something he dislikes.". ;) And there is another anecdote about his "aura of danger and being unbeatable"; there were many players who lost against him because they could not handle the pressure of his presence, e.g. Viswanathan Anand. Anand folded against Kasparow just because of the psychological pressure. Judith Polgar once said, after having trained with him, "I learned a lot in those 2 weeks of training with him. But, I could also see that even Garri is human ...and makes mistakes. He does not like certain systems and he does make mistakes. After seeing this human side of him, I am not as afraid as I used to be." ...and Polgar was able to beat him shortly after in that infamous earthquake game. :) Kramnik, also one of the few players able to beat Kasparow, once said: "I am not afraid of him. He got to prove his championship on the board." ...and it was Kramnik to dethrone him. Garri is a good guy with a few edges and ticks ...which is the spice in the soup. His reign as world champion would have been totally boring otherwise. Look at Carlsen. Nothing against Carlsen, but it was just better chess, more engaging, more drama, more action, more offensive chess under Kasparow. I personally understood Kasparow's chess more than I understood Karpow's.

Yeah, Kasparov understood dynamic positions better than anyone in chess history. Giri said in a stream recently that Kasparov would still crush anyone in a dynamic position. You can still see it when he commentates or on the rare occasions when he's playing blitz. He's old and a bit rusty but he still has the killer instinct in these complicated positions. I mean the guy has a positive score against Hikaru in blitz even though he retired more than 15 years ago. I'd say he's still a top ten player in blitz, it's a shame he doesn't play publicly more often.

@Hans Mahr No way he has a positive score vs Hikaru in blitz. That’s...insane.

@Emma Forman no. Magnus style is more similar to karpov than kasparov.

This has been my bed time viewing for like 18 of the last 21 days and I regret nothing. GK is incredible and GC is an excellent complement.

This is one of my favorite uploads from you. If you can find other giants explaining their games and make a video like this - where you cut between their explanations and show it / explain it like this- would be amazing. Best of luck!

Great stuff! You should make a series analyzing old games, as long as you can find the footage... adds an element to your video that takes it to another level

The fact that karpov saw all of that is amazing

This is such an amzing game, love that you featured it, you made it even more fun to watch 😍

"Essentially, I'm going to be Garry Kasparov's chess translator for all of you" Thanks Levy, your recaps really make me understand the game and its concepts a bit more. Your content has already helped me climb to 1000, and I feel great getting better at something I enjoy. Much love from Poland, awaiting future videos!

hey its been 5 months whats ur elo now???

Elo update?

The next 1000 is the hardest! Trust me on that.

youtube is deleting my comments wtf, anyway I'm 1800 rapid on lichess now

Cool stuff. Been watching you for a while and stumbled onto this video you made 1 year ago. Helpful to understand how beautiful of a game this was as Kasparov’s analysis goes to quick for me to fully digest the game. Blessings

In Calculation 3, timestamp 12:43 knight can go e7 and try to kick white's light square bishop, which I think is the most integral piece to deliver checkmate (Rh8#) because of the protection for Nf7 and rook's entry point on h5

Yes, do this style now and then again. Very entertaining and informative. Great job!

I think it would be hard to calculate all of those lines. It stems from the appreciation that the initial offer of the knight ought to work because the attacking side has greater resources. The computers can calculate every line and know it's a win. Kasparov has to initially feel that it should be won. Isn't that how other great players played, and also how individual masterpieces were achieved.

For anyone that might be interested, the footage of Kasparov calculating in this video, is from a documentary that was made about the World Chess Championship Match in Lyon, 1990. Here is a link to the whole documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxy1wYFN29M&t=7865s

The look on Kasparov's face every time he finishes rattling off some insane combination

Great video! Everything looks so easy and natural explained by Kasparov.

I'm fascinated by this idea of 5v3 being more dangerous than 7v5. I've always thought of trading down to blunt an attack as an important defensive resource, and of course sometimes it is but this is a really interesting situational counterpoint. I'm going to have to sit with this concept for a while and it might significantly change (for the better) how I look at both attacking and defending.

Can you please explain what that 5v3 being more dangerous than 7v5. means.

The more the pieces present in the board, then you have many options to defend your position. Because the more the pieces, the more the game will be complicated. Did you get my point? More pieces means more options you can make, but not all the time.

Would love to see a dive into the journey of Kasparov’s chess career, with pictures and videos and everything. Not sure how well a story-time-esk video would do but could be interesting

Hi Levy, I just bought the Caro-Kann and E4 bundle. So far they are amazing but a video on how to use/ set up PGN readers would be very instructive.

Levy, at 13:03, the knight could go to f4. I think you missed that part. It perfectly defends black cause then if bishop takes on b2, then knight takes g6. After that, the attack just dies. And karpov would be up in points.

"he kills this bishop" that's the best way to describe a capture ever

Actually, it's very popular in post soviet countries to say kills instead of takes.

in chinese it's "eats"

Stabbing a catholic

@veirant Well I don't really understand what you said but I live in Georgia and we say "kill" everytime :)

@Mike Crapse If it doesn't kill you, -it makes you stronger- *eat it*

What an absolutely incredible game and moment in chess history

Garry in his prime was wild

Kasparov not only calculates insane variations, but he puts all of the pieces BACK to their original positions for EACH variation he explains. This is why he is the Greatest of All Time.

Gotham, that's absolutely insane quality explanation of really hard stuff, I remember watching that on TV and understanding nothing many years ago. Thank you very much.

Great video! I feel that as amazing as Kasparov was, Karpov was possibly even more amazing in losing. He repeatedly passed up the first 3 or 4 most obvious lines whose refutations were not immediately clear to find some incredibly resourceful move that often forced Kasparov into situations were he had only one move to continue the attack. To his credit Kasparov found these moves too, but it is generally slightly easier to attack than to defend. They say it takes two great players to create a masterpiece and that was definitely the case here!

Really cool video. I've seen that clip of Kasparov before, but watching somebody who knows how to chess do it made it even more amazing.

Its unbelievable how it gets better with every single variation

Thats why Kasparov for me will always be the best, he did incredible things in times where computers didnt have the level of AI we have now

I would like to see the same concept with other iconic rivalries like magnus and hikaru.

That's actually breathtaking how Kasparov's chess were that deadly and yet calmly, kinda like a tank or cigarettes you now.

That double bishop attack is insane! Absolute madman! In the end black king was under attack literally from every direction!

Your videos have been killing it Gotham, keep up the great work

Hands downs, the most well-prepared and presented video this channel has ever done. Good to see a significant uptick in content, preparation, and presentation from this channel! Kudos!

Love it. Especially when it's Kasparov explaining his brilliance.

Brilliant commentary and walkthrough, Levy. I would love you to do more videos like this. I thoroughly enjoyed this and got something from it. Would love you to talk through GM Nigel Short’s only win against Garry Kasparov at the 1993 World Chess Championships in London, here in the UK. It’s game 16 as you probably know. I remember watching it on TV and going into school everyday where we were all willing Nigel to at least win one match, and he did! I’d love to get your thoughts on game 16 as it was a rare loss for Kasparov. 🇬🇧♟

This may be one of the first times somebody has said they have a great video in store and ACTUALLY had a great video in store. One of the best chess videos I've ever seen. Bravo.

Great content Levy. Interposing the analysis with cuts from the real video worked really well

Being honest already Saw this full video 2 Times and showed to some friends. Its so well done, thanks for sharing!! Great Game

Great video, I love this style of content. Kasparov is a genius.

I remember when Levy said "chess is a game of unlimited beauty, but it's not just checks and attacks, you have to be creative." And it's obvious that kasparov took that to heart in this match.

What a genius, no wonder he remained champion in over 2 decades...

To be able to play chess and beat Karpov like this, shows brilliancy by Kasparov.

these types of videos are incredible. thank you for everything you do

I am a weak player, but from what I learned by doing a lot of tactics I would probably play Rook takes instead of Bishop takes with check at the end of the game. Usually it is stronger to have a discovered check when rook and bishop work together. Funny that Kasparov didn’t play this although he saw basically every possible tactical shot in the game! What impressed me very much was the velocity in which Kasparov showed the variations! Incredible!

Kasparov is probably the greatest, but I have to say I'm very impressed with how well Karpov defended against these vicious attacks. It seems like he's always finding the perfect move to stay in the game and not take a lot of damage.

This video is pure gold! the mix with raw footage combined with levy’s pedagogical insights allow us to grasp and to appreciate for a moment how genius this man was!

The whole video is the best championship video ever - lyon 1990 kasparov Karpov

If you haven't analyzed yet, it is worth to show G10 of Kas vs Anand in the last championship series they played in the 90's.

Seeing this a year later, but this is probably one of my favorite videos of you Levvy. Great work 👏🔥💯♥️

I usually wonder how a game of chess championship final would be? What they will be thinking for every move? Stuffs like that! This explanation is awesome and thanks mate for this❤️