NASASpaceflight


@ZMYDaBeat
@ZMYDaBeat

NASA = NOt A Space Agency! look at the logo the snake lies

Vor 5 Minuten
@tanaporn589
@tanaporn589

Amazing👍🥰

Vor 9 Minuten
@Joeatsaco69
@Joeatsaco69

What no battery launches rockets?

Vor 27 Minuten
@phil1657
@phil1657

Slow down, add more words

Vor 50 Minuten
@stratcat3216
@stratcat3216

The wind must be blowing in there.. hair to one side and all....

Vor Stunde
@genericyoutube
@genericyoutube

it should be given away before being deorbited. It can be boosted in its orbit for relatively cheap. 70m tops.

Vor Stunde
@adisusanto3127
@adisusanto3127

I need your tech

Vor Stunde
@richardpuentes2935
@richardpuentes2935

Earth will someday give up

Vor 2 Stunden
@joelenders470
@joelenders470

You guys do such a good job. Thanks again.

Vor 2 Stunden
@Chironseth1970
@Chironseth1970

It was an extraordinary feat to go out into space and repair a huge telescope in space the way they did. An amazing achievement

Vor 2 Stunden
@snydedon9636
@snydedon9636

Ground control to major Tom.

Vor 2 Stunden
@waku7740
@waku7740

🍀🌷❤️❤️❤️🌷🍀

Vor 4 Stunden
@user-ew2bx7vt8o
@user-ew2bx7vt8o

Yea it does need another coat of paint!

Vor 5 Stunden
@trueethics6190
@trueethics6190

i think what would be more interesting is if they put a camera on the front of the "rocket", so we can see what is in front. We have been subject to the rear view washed out cloud covered cgi looking alleged ball earth for years now and it is boring, where are the front facing cameras on these alleged craft please?

Vor 6 Stunden
@EmmsM
@EmmsM

It's Dr Evil!

Vor 6 Stunden
@interstellarol.
@interstellarol.

we miss you MK1

Vor 6 Stunden
@michaelhalstead7532
@michaelhalstead7532

Wasn't that what it was supposed to do ?

Vor 6 Stunden
@sp66-know-try-think
@sp66-know-try-think

The mass of a spacecraft launched into orbit does not exceed 5% of the total launch mass of the rocket. For vehicles launched into deep orbits, most of the weight comes from fuel. If the flight is manned, then the weight of water, air, food, and disposable supplies is additionally taken away. The further/longer the flight, the greater the share of fuel, consumables and the smaller the share of functional equipment. This is a big problem. If you don’t think about it and don’t decide on it, astronautics will inevitably come to naught, without even properly mastering the Moon, for the banal reason of lack of sufficient resources. The role of chemical propulsion in extra-atmospheric flight must be reconsidered. The development of engines with high specific impulse is inevitable. Plus, it is necessary to create a system of platforms in intermediate calculated orbits, which should perform a role similar to the role of planets during gravitational maneuvers to simplify/accelerate flights across the Solar System. To do this, they must generate an electromagnetic field, through which they will capture flying spacecraft, accelerate/decelerate them, change direction, adjust the orbit, and possibly recharge with energy, exchange information and cargo.

Vor 7 Stunden
@ttrestle
@ttrestle

Huh? WHAT? HUUHH?!! WHAAAAT?!?!!!!

Vor 7 Stunden
@user-ny4qu9uz3t
@user-ny4qu9uz3t

Старайтесь, парни, потому что русские больше не продают вам РД-180, двигатели, которые выпускали для вас на построенном у вас заводе, имевшие 92 успешных запуска за последние 20 лет и ни одного аварийного. Теперь на своих,мальчики. Наши то по купленным документам и на построенном для вас заводе повторить не смогли.

Vor 7 Stunden
@ryushogun9890
@ryushogun9890

Do they ship it loaded with sand or something to simulate the real weight limit.

Vor 7 Stunden
@ryushogun9890
@ryushogun9890

Is it the third one?

Vor 7 Stunden
@egooidios5061
@egooidios5061

Hubble was just a downgraded KH-11 Kennen sattelite. Seems that initially they have overdone it with the downgrading

Vor 8 Stunden
@p.s.6021
@p.s.6021

🤢🤮👎

Vor 8 Stunden
@milanglisic7434
@milanglisic7434

with Russian engines...

Vor 9 Stunden